tpoppapuff--disqus
TPoppaPuff
tpoppapuff--disqus

You seem to be making an awful lot of caveats to get your argument across.

And you can't take a joke? lol, you replied to the first bait I threw out there when I invoked Finn and immediately retorted. Then I give another response with some clear humor and examples that are then blown into exaggeration and you go on an all caps and bold tirade, lol. And I can't take a joke… Want to try

But up until all of a couple years ago, Admiral Thrawn was one of the strongest commanders in Star Wars canon; a blue person, not human. Further, the Empire regularly employed various species for bounty hunting at least. We don't know the rest of the Empire's policies but it does seem as though they likely also had

Well, I'm saying that metaphorically speaking his comment was dumb and Weitz is an idiot for making it in the first place and the only right thing he did in regards to it was delete his tweet. And it doesn't even make sense. The only thing we know about the First Order is that they were really big fans of the Empire

lol you don't think ANY other person in the First Order was a POC? He was the one and only? Out of all the Storm Trooper faces we see in TFA, literally 100% of them were black. Granted, small sample size, sure, but to think he was also the only black person in the entire First Order like you're saying ("being

The majority of republicans overall like Ben Carson. And I'm sure if more POC were like Ben Carson, republicans would be happier. Don't forget that it's the democrats and the liberal media that mock him and call him an "Uncle Tom."

She deserves to be paid more than anyone else on the show now. Nobody watches the show for Macy. He's barely in the show. While he deserved more in the first couple seasons, he hasn't brought people in on his name recognition in a long time. With that said, the show should be cancelled after this next season. It's

If people start boycotting Star Wars based on misinformation, they're no better than the idiotic protestors of the election (and reality).

I'm sorry, by most accounts the way Schumer acted is deemed as an asshole way to conduct oneself assuming no political bias. Now, the news will state that Trump is indeed an asshole and label Clinton as a saint for putting up with Trump even though Hillary "Trumped up trickle down haha ain't I cute" Clinton is a huge

Ha, not even. Look at how the spending is as a percentage of the GDP and factor in on top of that look at the times for those presidents themselves. In the 80's we had the Cold War. Technology arms races are expensive. Is it Bush's fault Osama flew planes into the WTC? No. Did he go overboard and get us into too many

No, they gave him zero positive press. You are wrong and you're attempting to rewrite history. Clinton put national security at risk and broke the law and yet is about to be elected president. Let's not even pretend they've received the same level of criticism. That's asinine.

Also, FWIW, I understand some people's opinions and why they would vote Democrat because to them the social issues are more important than the economic. To me, the economic affects everyone. People can do whatever the hell they want as long as it doesn't impact my life, but as soon as I have to pay for it, that's

No, it was beyond that. It wasn't that she has a different point of view. It's that she acted like a bitch. She was condescending, antagonizing, dismissive, strereotyped others and then became even more condescending with her apology. She was objectively, being a bitch to others. She was belittling others and yes,

The press, try as they might to make everything about him pure evil, can't look away. Trump gets people's attention and if the liberal media completely ignore his existence, than sure his name won't come up quite as often, but those same people will go to Fox to find out what Trump said and that's bad business. At

"If you have serious concerns over the potential bias in the media then I suggest you look into it with more seriousness than merely highlighting a single potential instance."
So every time it happens I should have to write a manifesto? No, about once out of every 50 I see I make a comment, so it's still a s—- ton of

And sadly Obama's done it worse than anybody in his position. Either way, the right side is usually aligned far more in favor of the middle class, and really anyone above the poverty level, so that's where my vote is going.

I'm only responding to what you said. I wasn't the one who mentioned a boogeyman first, that was you.

Yet Obama took office on January 3, 2009. How long have we had armed forces on foreign soil during his term? You want less military spending that's fine, but why does that immediately turn into UHC?

No, it's absolutely not. He became the Republican candidate because he is a rabble rouser who called for change and is whether, you personally like it or not, a very charismatic person. Love him or hate him, he grabs people's attention and is very good at it. He's been doing it for decades.

I very well understand the difference, but unlike yourself I look at what Clinton is offering and so far it's been about as bad as it could get and her plan is to keep the policies of the last administration. Now you can try and divert the argument with more ad hominem attacks and continue to render yourself unable to