ooohh, that is a no-no.

Admittedly I dint read the article, but does this imply that a wifi jammers are now smart enough to only jam unknown wifi radio signals? Selective wifi jamming is a thing?

It looks like the ability to kill the driver was a primary concern. The wheels/frame fit ever so nicely under that barrier.

I'm not sure it is correct from a legal standpoint, but it sure seems like they'd take a publicity hit the next time Tor is hacked/cracked/bugged/gassed and people realize their traffic wasn't properly annonymized.

I'm not sure why Mozilla would want to get into the "security" game. Seems like they would assume a lot of liability when Tor fails to fully anonymize some hapless FF user's traffic.

If Top Gear taught me anything, it is that we better bring two or three Raptors to destroy a single Hilux.

Yea, because Comcast would let this happen.

Something about the front plate looks off. Photoshop?

One time I road on a bus.

No one will die in a Volvo because they'll all be safely parked at the dealerships! Zing.

4 hours each way is a perfect day for a regional trucker.

I'm on a corp owned device/plan now, so I go:

Ah, I got it. You're identifying DHCP clients, not servers. I was thinking fing was able to identify DHCP servers.

I've got fing for ios, I'm wondering if that can find dhcp devices also? Not on wifi so I can test.

Hotel California is only acceptable en Espanol.

Who gets the stuffed chicken at a steakhouse?

That is an ugly vehicle.

I am not anymore, but maybe I once was. There are several 100,000's Hobos plying the skies weekly. Those hobos get all the airline love.

You know what? You can shove your medal up your fucking ass! Because I don't give a shit about your medal. Because I knew you before you were a mathematical God. When you were pimple-faced and homesick and didn't know which side of the bed to piss on!