@minneyar: I do not deny the difficulty of such revolutionizing of language.

@Arctic_Visionary: Um... What are you talking about?

@infi: I am not saying I want to address how they use numbers. I am actually acknowledging his side of the argument. But at the same time, I am showing how it can be resolved.

@Leanid: Japanese do have way more way of counting numbers. Korean is not as severe. But it does have different way of calling numbers depending on object vs. live forms. Also, honorific vs. casual. But it works fine without Kanji and in most case, you use arabic numbering form just like how you indicated there.

@hsin: I don't understand why it would be hard to understand when every spoken and written sentence is in context of subject matter that it is dealing with. Are you saying any alphabetical written words are hard to understand? How would English language work without any pictographs?

@namesRhard: Korean's grammar and usage of alphabetical letters for their written form is very similar to Japanese.

@Riquez: What are you talking about? Kanji is originally not Japanese. It's essentially chinese characters that both Japan and Korea "borrowed" before they had their own written language.

I still don't understand why Japan and Korea have to use Kanji/Hanja.

@Torokun: haha

"he also knows a good game developer when he sees one. "

This ad could have been an SNL skit 10 years ago.

"This man's name is..."

@CMW89: Haha! That would be fantastic!

Solid Mario

YES!

I hope they don't do this to the new Stratos coming out... What a waste of a historic beauty...

another anglomanga... sigh...

@Sean Netzel: such as...?

No love for LA...

@Nicholas Lovell: Mr. Lovell,