They’re keeping it. Directly contradicts their usual stance on corporations profiting off social issues, wouldn’t you say?

Well, they do call us gun humpers...maybe they’re just encouraging us to live the demented fantasies they believe we have. Personally, I’ve never had a single romantic feeling for that well engineered collection of wood, steel and aluminum that sits in my gun safe.

Nothing. But that is the DOJ that should have done it. Because the Bush admin did the torture and the Obama DOJ was next temporally. I suppose I could have said the Clinton DOJ but that would not have made sense. Because time moves forward in a linear fashion.

I don’t really see the legal basis for a claim. The law is on the President’s side here.

The tipping exists at all so that employers can pay servers less than minimum wage, and that is shit.

“Nobody, particularly not CEOs, actually believes that a CEO’s job is 140 times harder than the job of the mid-level worker.”

I think they would argue they bring 140x the value as a mid-level worker.

I never thought I’d see the day that Hamno would be called out for not adequately encouraging people to unionize.

But if you do have a degree in business or accounting - or anything of any substance, really - you can absolutely see that this premise is asinine. If you are the leader of, and responsible for, a company that employees hundreds or thousands or tens of thousands of employees, and through your leadership that company…

I assume based on the arguments you have made that you would be equally okay with every General Electric employee getting a pay cut. After all, the CEO lost his job and the stock price has plummeted. Or, do the employees only share in the gains with none of the risk of the losses?

//You do not need a degree in business or accounting to know that it is unfair for the CEO of your company to make in one year what it would take you three or four hundred years to make. //

No, I don’t know this. Wages are set by supply and demand and there is a huge demand for competent CEO’s.

Did you say something? Thought I smelled a fart.

What if I told you executives were just better at negotiating their salary than your average worker? There isn’t anything wrong with that.

Why is this a problem? We protect way less important things with firearms, so why not kids?
If a trained teacher, a former military/police, or someone in the reserves want to conceal carry in a school they should have every right. Thats the fun thing about conceal carry, you don’t know who is and who isn’t. They are…

So when it comes to what is taught on college campuses today, it’s clear that wealthy donors exert much more influence than the student activists supposedly suppressing free speech. The same goes for which professors and academics have flourished.

But she wasn’t invited by the Federalist Society, the national organization. She was invited by the Lewis & Clark chapter of the Federalist Society, the local student organization.

This will go over well with the non-critical thinking crowd, so it is perfect here where feelings reign supreme..

No, the idiots have this one right, you... other kind of idiot. Those rich donors are pushing their own agendas, sure, but these illiberal children are the ones continuing the left’s war on un-approved speech. Your whataboutism is misplaced here.

I didn’t understand this. You’re saying that the real problem is the people inviting disgusting people to speak on campuses? How is that an argument in favor of free speech?

Is this, like, a bit you do? The reactive anger of sports talk radio variety?

to the greatest injustice since the Cherokee were forced west on the Trail of Tears