too-grey-to-function-5
Too Grey to Function
too-grey-to-function-5

Ok, so is this pandering? Yeah. But, they’re also donating money to go good causes, so that’s a good thing, no? Also, even if it’s just an advertising campaign, isn’t a bit of representation better than none at all?

We’re ignoring sever lapses from multiple levels of law enforcement that led to the deaths of children because...it’s hypocritical?

The blame is deserved.

and real guns keep killing innocent people.

As soon as the Powers that Be can find some way to profit from it.

“...real guns keep killing innocent people...” 

Agreed. If you have guns and kids, lock up the guns and teach the kids basic firearms safety. Neglecting either is not being a responsible owner/parent and asking for an accident.  

If you own guns, its important to both lock the gun up securely and introduce the child to guns as soon as you feel comfortable. Better to have them know about it AND understand it and its power, rather than have them know about it and not.

I don’t know if it has anything to do with it being taken from you... they said women with a gun in the household, not women who own guns... Based on everything I’ve read/know, it’s a safe bet that most of these household guns belong to the abuser.

This guy was pathetic. There’s absolutely no excuse for him to hang around outside while children are being murdered. He’s the only person there with the ability to protect those kids, and he shit the bed. He’s a coward and there’s simply no other way around it. If you’re not prepared to die at any given moment you

How old is she? 6?

Does this mean I won’t ever have her as an Uber driver?

That would be a good way to get your visa pulled, and deported. If you’re working or studying in China, you carry on and pretend to know nothing, see nothing and hear nothing when it comes to official policies and practices-at least in public.

In Soviet Russia, Party finds you!

but that doesnt make for good outrage

This is “sexist” to the extent that having body checking in mens but not womens hockey is “sexist”. This piece seems to suggest that absent these differences and historical discrepecies in training and resources allocated, women would be able to compete against men on a level playing field, which is just not true. In

This. I went to NYU for undergrad - I get why she would be offended, but I also remember the staff at the dining halls. They are working class New Yorkers, just trying to make a living. They were told to make a meal for black history month by their (non NYU) employer, and they did what they thought would be right. Now

NYT reports that the employees are no longer with the company (per the Aramark statement). So you’re incorrect.

You mean like the black people who planned the meal per the article?