Couple more fun facts that I’ve seen...car burns roughly 1.5 gallons of nitro per second under throttle, meaning it consumes just under 6 gallons to move 1000 feet. Yes, consumption is measured in feet per gallon, not miles per gallon.
Couple more fun facts that I’ve seen...car burns roughly 1.5 gallons of nitro per second under throttle, meaning it consumes just under 6 gallons to move 1000 feet. Yes, consumption is measured in feet per gallon, not miles per gallon.
I see what you did there.
Blasphemy of the best kind.
Is Amazon already filming the Top Gear replacement?
You know, this is where Tesla’s in-home battery can actually make a huge difference. Battery charges at night, and can smooth out the peaks and valleys of electricity demand. Having an extra 7-10 kW-h of juice on hand without having to hit up the local nuclear plant can be pretty useful...freeze the house from 5-7…
Methinks you are looking at the gross weight by mistake.
At the same time, the AWD system in the base Impreza is much different than the one in the STi.
Your reply to me about my reply to you has nothing to do with my reply to you.
They might have also grown up in Texas.
You might want to reply to the guy that mentioned fires. Hint: It wasn’t me.
Have you missed that it’s not limited to Japanese cars?
Amen on the not for profit gig. Just explain to anyone with that mentality that FIFA is also a non-profit organization.
...at 2-3 times the displacement of your “big” V8, too.
With a dash of Mark Ruffalo thrown in for genetic diversity.
He has the name of the next great Bond villain, and the looks to match.
Hence why I said “if”. It’s in the realm of possibility.
Actually, if they put a motor at each corner, with a little bit of a lift and some offroad tires it could be amazing. Who needs 47 differentials and a low speed transfer case when you have completely independent power and speed control at each wheel? Maybe Tesla makes a Model X Rubicon edition.