So lemme get this straight—we're all in danger of being attacked by young, single, male bears? Is this "science" or did a scientist simply spend a lot of time at the Eagle and/or The Lone Star?

About on par? I get that the whole thing is about the irrationality of fear (suck it, EP), and the stated project is sort of clever in trying to provoke the same response in its audience. That being said, this still seems sort of, I dunno, indulgent, staged as a documentary, anyway. Although, I suppose the tongue is…

This is tremendously silly.

Notably, that's only slightly more complicated/ridiculous than the actual Summers family tree, but uh... I guess every family has it's issues, amirite?

They could even make it a fun Triviagasm about the ridiculous profusion of repeated names in comics more generally, since the Angels are hardly the only ones who inherently set up this sort of confusion. Uncannyxmen.net would be a good source, since the character profiles there, IIRC, already adopt a roman numeral…

This x 1000. Yes, it's confusing and counterintuitive, but please move on, internet.

The early 90's Animated Series already did the full Phoenix Saga (as well as strange variations on The Age of Apocalypse and The Phalanx Covenant), but that might be a bit dated looking compared with what I think you want. I'd like to see someone try to do Inferno, but that would probably have to be after quite a few…

No, it's another Angel, Angel Salvadore (from Morrison's run on New X-Men). There have been (at least) two. =/ And you call yourself a nerd. smh

This is my obligatory, curmudgeonly comment about how I stopped reading superhero comics because Big Events a) are tedious b) are of inconsistent quality c) consistently keep monthlies from actually telling interesting stories.

It was one of the secondary mutations they introduced back in the early oughts before the series went all conservative again following House of M. That's also why we have Kitty Beast.

I've read that elephants also bury their dead and undergo mourning practices, but I'm not sure if this is true.

Amy Adams also had a cameo (read: early career break) on "Buffy," where she played Tara's cousin in that one episode where, uh, they inaugurated Tara as a member of the Scooby Gang. Or something.

I also preferred that reboot costume (if you're referring to the one on the left in the last pic up above) and thought that's what they would be going for with the TV reboot.

"This is the storyline where shit gets real for Matt Murdock, and the hero basically goes insane when his ex sells his identity off for heroin."

And that's kind of Noe's shtick; a lot like Von Trier, he just wants to make you feel terrible, and then expects you to applaud him for it when he inevitably accomplishes his "goal." But at least Von Trier's stuff is sometimes interesting on some level; "Irreversible" was one of the most mind-numbingly boring attempts…

Jokes about the South notwithstanding, this is one of the reasons why I'm always flabbergasted when folks try to politicize (and thus dismiss) the current First Lady's efforts to counter childhood obesity (and the adult variety, for that matter) with education about healthier eating habits and exercise. Sorry, but if…

For more of the amazingness that is comparative animal sex, with the added twee benefits of Isabella Rossellini, check out her "Green Porno" series and book.

A-fucking-men. This is the point where her activism crosses over from "doing with" to "doing for." The instant that she makes ontological claims on my behalf, she's officially gone from "ally" to "overbearing opportunist." It doesn't help that all of this is dressed up in claims of biological determinism—for which I'm…

I'm guessing that Angel is a dancer at the Hellfire Club, as we know Emma will also be in this. It would also be a nice follow-through on the brief partnership the characters had in New X-Men, when Emma takes her on as a new prize pupil after the Stepford Cuckoos end up being less than she hoped for.