tomservo-old1
Tom_Servo
tomservo-old1

As every surprised parent knows, "pull back" doesn't always work.

@mtfmuffins: Haha! You fem-Gizmodians are so cute.

@CptnGrammar: I actually agree with you. We have become major gadget snobs.

@Scientz: Congratulations! You're the 746th person to post that.

Is it bad that I lawled?

@cjschmidt: Yes. I was sent back to acquire a decrepit ass IBM 5100.

@juan_ozuna: On the contrary. Justin Beiber's really a female in male drag.

@Tachyon0118: Yea. I thought of that after I posted, but was too late to edit. Apparently my brain hasn't woken up yet...

I swear to God, I thought it said "Science Research Cunts Will Ruin Us All".

"Irene P. Waters: So I smoked some pot, what is that a crime?

You have to admire Palm. They have one foot in the grave and one up Sprints ass. The balls are just kinda teeter-tottering.

@mojoman0: I have NO idea what you just said, but it sounded impressive enough to get you approved.

@Arken: Not really (Well unless you factor in that "turbo" mode crap). But the signal travels quite a bit further. The main reason the 5ghz radio is in the off position on my DIR-825.

@SKiTz: LOL. And this is why you have a star.

@iceph03nix: That's exactly what the metal perforated "window" on the front does. The perforations are smaller than the 2.4ghz signal, thus blocking the manboobs from getting nuked. They don't use it all the way around the casing, however. I'm sure there's a reason it's not, but it seems like the logical thing to do.

@Curves: My thoughts exactly. (Wow, that sounds like a good name for a band.)

Awesome title, but this comment here "but it's not so hard to imagine this kind of physics-cheating sensor technology shrunk into your phone, one day." kinda makes one go "hmmm".