But if Deen is saying this did not happen, and there is no evidence either way, why do you not think we should believe him? What’s the thought process here? The presumption of innocence is not merely some abstract legal nicety but derives from principles of fairness and justice that ought not to be contingent on…

It’s like being a public defender, neither profitable nor popular - but we must trust in the system because over time it has been proven to be the best way to achieve a reasonably just society compared to any other system humans have tried. It’s not perfect and more often than not the guilty go free and the victims…

Or Darth Binks