Or the many times Trump has referred to it as a ban... Just a quick search of @realdonaldtrump ban on twitter shows two glorious bits of evidence:

hmmmmmm.....

when you have 60 people with the exact same damn name as a known terrorist it requires some time for burocrats to remove their heads from their asses and figure it out.

What about Syrian refugees, they aren’t allowed in ‘indefinitely.’ Does that meet your definition of a ban?

Ok. It’s a temporary ban on countries with majority Muslim populations with a provision that allows for persecuted religious minorities (NON-MUSLIMS) the opportunity to still obtain visas, and refugee status.

Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols would disagree.

Christians don’t commit terrorism. They just occasionally suffer from mental illnesses that make them commit acts that look just like terrorism.

Do we really have any need to step up on stopping terrorists from entering the country? I mean seriously, we lose fewer people to terrorist attacks annually as we do to people dying from intentionally inserting foreign objects up their rectums.

“Jobs!!! Hurrrdurrr emails! Benghazi! Pizzagate! Fuck brown people! Down with Obamacare but keep the ACA!”

Trump: No really... I’m gonna blow up the planet! Uh... And screw your wives! and... geez these guys are slow... Hey lets get rid of an entire religion too! It’ll be the best country there ever was, everyone will be rich or dead!

Later today:

You mean the fact that we have a fascist president might be why government agencies are taking the same steps to close transparency that are usually done in fascist governments? No idea why you would connect those two things.

Title should read:

Not excusing the University but what idiot thinks 30 grams of anhydrous caffeine won’t fuck you up? That’s like a dime bag full. Honestly, put 30 grams of powdered sugar or cornstarch on a digital kitchen scale and you can get a sense of how much caffeine that is. Don’t bother, I have. (Yes, I tared the penny)

Love for a daughter and hatred for the Empire

I presume you stopped reading the article at that point, as it goes on to explain specifically why it did not stop. Basically, the human is the boss, and they may override anything with their decisions. This would be useful in a situation where you were, say, faced with a glass store front while an out-of-control…

Genuinely asking where in the article it’s indicated that this is a bad thing?

I didn’t know Onstar had radar tracking and made driving decisions for me. Learn something new every day.

Well Tesla is also not desperately seeking funding so it’s possible that I was talking about someone else. Perhaps an EV company that just recently made an outrageous 0-60 claim on a stripped, non-production test mule.

According to Electrek, that means the Tesla P100D will now be able to go from 0-60 in 2.4 seconds—shaving a millisecond off of the already impressive acceleration.