Are you going to provide those numbers? 'Cause otherwise bringing them up anecdotally is pretty silly.

The point, is finding things to do around you.

The system was designed to be about finding things to do. Many users seems to be trying to turn it into a list of goals.

Find things to do in your area.

I've been using Libre Office for about 6 months now. I have weird issue copying from anything Libre and pasting into anything not Libre...very annoying.

Here's how I do it:

This seems a bit ridiculous to me. "requiring you to learn a bunch of pre-set commands." Really?

It looks like users have turned it into a goals tracker of sorts. I see things like "Lose 10 pounds." I don't think that's what they intended the service for.

That's how all of Google's products work. Google builds products for the perfect internet bubble that is the Google company. Outside of it, they don't make as much sense.

Agreed. I was really impressed with that feature. Now it just utilizes screen space poorly and runs slower.

Looks like I spoke too soon. Currents is pretty awesome.

Does NO ONE use news readers on Android? Pulse is nice, and Feedly is OK...but it seems liek iOS gets all the fancy news readers...

Wow, really? iBooks never had a night mode? That's a pretty basic feature for a full color reader...

You're the man! (Or something less cheesy while still being properly representative of your level of awesome.)

Holy Crap Robbie, Please share those beautiful icons in the 'updated' picture. That are beautiful.

Here's the problem...on a bike, I'm endangering MYSELF by listening to loud music. In a car, I'm dangerous to OTHERS. So, obviously, it's OK to do whatever I want in my car.

I'm so frustrated about Google+. It's such a better service. It's put together so well. There are so many tiny, tiny details that make it so much more usable than Facebook.

You assume everyone's using bittorrent, and getting very large files. But that's not always true.

It may be worth knowing that the way you've placed the context links in the video makes them unclickable when embedded on lifehacker.com. If you try to click them, the play controls come up and cover them.

Yeah, this looks like a nice proof of concept that is almost completely missing content.