Lol a majority of the “writers” here are shit. Im not going to stroke any egos or make people think they’re special when their churning out articles they can’t be bothered to do any research on. But shitty “takedowns” pay the bills I guess. It’s funny you guys are so gung ho to defend mediocre blogging as…

Eh. I’ll get a reminder that I have an account and come back in a year. And somehow be surprised it’s gotten even worse than before. 

Bless your heart. Is your favorite flavor green?

That’s funny. I didn’t think 1995 was in the 80’s.

It wasn’t a good car to drive, wasn’t particularly powerful, and looks pretty bad.

I mean. Okay? Seems pretty pointless when it’s not even in a Lexus SC430 and has a complete custom exhaust and modified for track use. That really doesn’t mean there’s “untapped potential” in the SC430. 

You’re fucking blind if you mix a Q50 dash up with a Venza. But you write for Jalopnik so I guess that goes without saying.

Or someone did and found a better deal. I barely ever see anyone pay MSRP for a Q50. And honestly the C class looks boring, the A4 isn’t very good to drive, and the 3 series blends into a sea of lease specials.

I still don’t understand why everyone equates rock crawling as the only form of off-roading. There’s so much more than just rock crawling. Like when people shit on overland vehicles like Rovers and Cayennes because they can’t go through Moab so they obviously aren’t “real” off roaders.

Everybody uses cheap components. That wasn’t a GM exclusive thing. 

Eh. They’re fine. People love to cry and jerk each other off about how “bad” GM is. But while their products were boring in the 90’s. They weren’t near as bad as people make them out to be. They were just super average. We’re they better than the competition? Eh. No. But were they bottom of the barrel and undrivable?…

The old one WAS a rocket

We really didn’t need 5 posts in a row though. Especially for the absolute garbage articles we got. Most big launches don’t get that many articles at once. Hell even this article got reposted because they had to fix their numbers. 

That’s some Jalopnik level writing. Now if you can do it in crayon you’re hired. 

Remains to be seen. A cup holder presumably has something sitting on the front of the phone. This has nothing and looked like it’s only barely tilted forward. Not enough where acceleration won’t knock it back. It shouldn’t take much to dislodge it. It’s why automakers have been using horizontal pockets for the last…

Those are some nice facts. But I’m worried they’ll get in the way of us getting more Tundra articles. We only have 5 today. If we can’t post frivolous comparisons that are incorrect, how will we shit on the Tundra? 

I don’t think the tundra bed has a payload capacity that’s enough to carry all these shitty takes Jalopnik is putting out. 

Didn’t imply they were slow. Just that any acceleration will knock it from the unsecured spot they’ve chosen. 

You must be young. This site has always been like this. People were crying about it being too political when Bush was still in office.

That near vertical wireless charging pad is dog shit. Because when you accelerate briskly it’ll just cause the phone to just tilt back and lose contact with the charging pad. And there also wireless carplay. The necessity of staring at your phone at all is pretty much moot.