toasterlad--disqus
Toasterlad
toasterlad--disqus

Most of the viewers would agree with you.

If you can't look at your phone, how do you know you have to leave due to an emergency?

You shouldn't have felt bad for her. The others were so busy yukking it up, she was the only one who sounded rational and serious. I was actually furious that no one on that show - and no one on the follow-up show they did a few weeks later - refuted her arguments with actual science. They made her look far more

Oh my god, what a great Pied Piper Paul Lynde would have been.

It's pretty funny to complain that fans don't want variety in defense of a studio that is trying to turn every single one of its superhero characters into the exact same powerless asshole.

Exactly

Or sometimes, 8-9. - M. Knight Shyamalan.

and WHAT a boy!

If wanting a 46" computer monitor makes me a geek, then bring on the wedgies!

You said that people shouldn't feel pressured to come out. You said that in response to my post that people coming out is the reason we've made the advancements we've made. The implication is clearly that people are being pressured to come out because of the people who have already come out and made the change. If

I didn't miss out at all. "Progress has happened because gay people have come out" does not equal "If I don't come out, it's my fault people hate gays". Not sure why you felt the need to make that distinction: it does not follow from my argument. If people feel pressure to come out, they certainly shouldn't be blaming

I didn't say that gay people had to come out. I'm very protective of everyone's right to decide when and if and how much they want to come out, and to whom. I said that the more people DO come out, the faster change will happen. You can insist that straight people should accept gay people regardless of first-hand

I've visited Arkansas a few times and you don't have to get far out of Little Rock to hit the sticks…with a church on every corner, no legal liquor, and a LOT of talk about Jeebus. That said, I can't honestly say I've ever met a person I disliked there, although of course they exist there as they do everywhere. A gay

Except in Indiana, where they can kick you out for them!

Roger will get to it once he's through eating out Dan Snyder's ass.

Don't. It's too soon. Just…don't.

The scene was clearly intended to invoke the (very real) specter of same-sex spouses being denied visitation rights in hospitals, with Joe as the savior straight bridging the gap of ignorance. If they wanted to go that route, I would have preferred that they go all out, and make the nurse a homophobic asshole who

I've never met most of the spouses of the people I work with, but I know their names.

I'm well aware of Hollywood's history with gay villains. I'm also aware of Hollywood's history of the Saintly Negro, and his young son, the Loyal Gay Best Friend. Given where we are in entertainment in 2015, there's no reason to assume a show like Walking Dead can't be trusted to have nuanced gay characters with

Driving down an unknown highway at night, wrecking the car, forced to abandon it and fight walkers, when they could have ridden down a cleared highway in the daytime, if he had trusted Aason.