Ohhhhhh. I just thought she didn't have nipples anymore.
I'm not tall but I'm long-waisted and have the same issue. If you can find a dress that hits at your actual waist, it can be flattering. But I find that most are far too short (in length and in the waist) and stretchy (I hate knits).
I take it out before I poop, and then replace it after I'm done. I hate period poops. They are the worst.
why does it bother me that the socially accepted life goal for all women should be to be as thin as possible rather than focusing on being happy, kind to others, contributing to the world in a positive way or whatever else one wants?
I can't wear skater dresses. I'm 5'10" and my torso is too long so the waist hits me in a super weird spot and they just never fit right on me.
Dress skinny? Face it, fellow commuters: you're lucky if I dress clean.
Which would mean that if I accumulated a vast library of child porn images via trade/filesharing, but never exchanged any money for any child porn, I would not be legally guilty of possessing child pornography. That...doesn't seem like a good loophole to have.
Said porn site is supposed to advertise the fact that their models are all of appropriate age. If it doesn't, get the fuck out of there.
There is more than one person in America, therefore both things are possible.
You forgot Michael Keaton, man. He and Adam West are the only Batmans that matter!
Yeah maybe if they had a "most improved" category, or a "you're doing better, but still have a long way to go in regards to the people your institution disenfranchises" category the pope might have a shot....
So pleased with the actual winners. Nice start out the day with some good news for a change.
On topic: It might seem to compelling to you to argue that images don't count as child pornography if you personally can be convinced that the subjects are over 18, but the only determining factor that actually matters, in point of fact, is whether or not they are goddamned children.
But I can't - because you're always walking around with your damn earbuds in ("Don't talk to me!")
The misogyny, while dumb, isn't even the worst part of these photos. The bros watching the games with baseball gloves on and shit are an affront to humanity as a whole.
If she's suing for the funds it will take to relocate her family and keep them afloat until new jobs are found, I'll allow it. That seems like an expense that is necessary for this child's well-being that would not have been necessary but for the mixup. If she's suing for emotional distress, she can get bent.
Don't be fooled. Don't be fooled into thinking that she believes that the removal of embryos is as bad as killing a human being. What she really means is that the killing of Jews is as serious as killing a 5-week embryo. TRUST me. That's how much she cares about the killing of Jews, Roma and gay people. Very little.
I switched to IT. Not making millions but enough to get by currently.
Oh yes, that is a weird contradiction. I misread your post and thought you were wondering why they usually let their research careers atrophy.
Sometimes that baffles me, and then sometimes I spend all day tweaking figure captions only to learn that our dean makes a quarter million dollars a year NOT doing things like that, and then I understand.