One winning formula for the future is certainly going after bestselling novels, like Harry Potter, The Twilight Saga, 50 Shades Of Grey or The Hunger Games. Since many of those books are geared toward children and / or women, the movies offer the opportunity of casting more female leads while bringing almost certain…

Tom Cruise is the worst possible example to bolster your claim. His movies (33) as a lead actor have amassed allmost $7 billion worldwide. He’s probably the most bankable actor in movie history, like him or not. His latest movie (Mission Impossible Rogue Nation) has made more than $500 million so far.

That’s not true. The movie was sold as a Mad Max sequel, starring Tom Hardy as Mad Max, also starring Charlize Theron as Furiosa, when in reality it was a Charlize Theron movie with er as the outright lead, also starring Tom Hardy as Mad Max. Big difference, which purposefully wasn’t revealed beforehand, bc the movie…

I don’t put myself in the position of those movie execs, but they play a numbers game and as long as outright male leads for action movies are a relatively safe bet, they won’t take many chances messing with the formula. Here’s a list of the 100 most sucessful movies in history. Pick the action/superhero movies. There…

Studio Exec: Action movies with women in outright leading roles never succeed. We can’t do it.

Wait now, do we like Our Brand is Crisis all of a sudden, bc just a few day ago, it got murdered around here for it’s white saviorism and such? I shudder what the critics would have been with a male lead. lol

Pro tip - every time a penis-owner reads the phrase ‘penis-owner’, he’ll be less inclined to hear whatever the other person has to say.

Sorry, the phrasing “Your username before this comment” seemed a little odd to me, as if my comment had somehow irked you.

Makes sense. I slept through large parts of the 1990s.

Well dude, if you have a problem with my comment, spill it out. Don’t pussyfoot around.

What could be more 1990s than a coke binge?

Before or after the drug binge?

Whatever happened to going to a restaurant or a day at the spa?

Just look at the majority of comments here, everytime someone starts with ‘guys won’t date me because..’ followed by a description of the physical features of said commenter, is a knock on guys for being prejudiced about the physical appearance of the women they like to date. Men being shallow and visual creatures vs…

You called me an MRA by virtue of your red pill remark.

You’ve really created a correlation between height and “standards for his personality”, whatever that’s supposed to mean anyway? That’s even worse than a guy who doesn’t mind the girl being boring and dumb, as long as she has big tits. Smh

To begin with: who has the right to tell anyone what their personal criteria for dating can or should be?

Only that the ‘entitled’ party isn’t so entitled, it’s the ‘cheated on’ party in that case. If you believe that expecting your partner NOT to cheat on you is entitlement, then you probably deserve the same treatment to show you, how the other side feels. This is true for both men and women of all races, not just…

What’s wrong with that sentence, regarding both tone and substance? Is it the fact that she adressed women as ‘ladies’? Is that now the gravest insult that can be leveled at women nowadays? Geez, I disagree with almost everything any republican candidate has said so far, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.