Let me quote the first sentence of the first review that I linked to:

It is the same. Private clubs offering private memberships to a selected group of people. One is frowned upon, the other is hailed as ‘empowering’. I know, logic is not your strong suit, but come on, give it a try!

Read the first recommended review and don’t hesitate coming back for more questions as to why a gym chain called ‘Lady of America’ “created by women for women” serves as a hint as to why this might be a women’s only gym.

“You seem to be itching for a disagreement “

♫ I just called to say I’ll sue you ♫

Then why do we continue to have all these discussions, whenever women want access to men’s clubs and sue for gender discrimination? When I have a private colf club (like Augusta National Golf Club for example) for men only, why should there even be grounds for a discrimination lawsuit and yet, that always seems to be…

You’re another one of those who deems it right to ban certain groups from certain venues by declaring them private clubs. I guess you never had a problem when golf clubs used this line of reasioning to exclude women and minorities? It’s the same logic - sorry, members only!

I know, it’s heresy for beer drinkers. Sorry for that.

“Trust me, it can happen to the best of us!”

You mean, a members only club just like those exclusive golf clubs that excluded women and POC for the longest time? Yes, I can see how that works for you. Great logic. There’s ‘bad’ discrimination and then there’s ‘good’ discrimination apparently.

Yes it does:

So, gender discrimination should be based on one’s personal feelings about safety? Got it.

A dark rape revenge ‘comedy’? What’s next ?

6:2 Serena first set. It’ll go downhill from there for Venus.

No, bc first you have to prove an unsafe environment for women in general, that cannot be remedied by the owner of the club without excluding half of the potential customers. You couldn’t do that even if you tried. Those women only clubs exist bc men don’t care. There is no upside for men in suing.

You mean ‘private membership’ as in exclusive golf club memberships, excluding women and POC among other groups in the past? That kind of private membership? Oh sure, that’s ok then. Absolutely justified, yep. The day that ‘you feeling uncomfortable’ is grounds for discrimination is the day we could also officially…

Bitter Jets fan? Sorry, ‘Bitter Jets fan’ reads like a pleonasm.

Nail biter? Oh, come on. Venus won’t put up much of a fight. She won’t stand in the way of tennis history and spoil her sister’s big party.

Every place could be declared such an environment. That’s a mere claim, not grounds for gender discrimination. Imagine a claim by a straight male club member of being harassed by a gay male club member and the ensuing discrimination lawsuits based on sexual orientation. Just because YOU may feel unsafe doesn’t give…

It’s a ‘private club’ just like a privately owned business, like a barbershop for example. Here’s a women only fitness club chain in America