Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • theroot
    tjw
    tjw
    tjw

    Right, the whole point is that B-12 realizes that this isn’t humanity’s world anymore. It belongs to the robots and they deserve a chance to experience it all.

    Welp. Never playing that again.

    Aside from the obvious ones, I will add: Don’t attempt to back into a parking spot if there are people behind you in the row. I am not a mind reader. I do not know what your intentions or parking skills are. If you drive past a parking spot and I’m behind you, I’m going to assume you don’t want it and I am going to

    Hulu Live has something like this but they only limit it on smart TVs and Rokus and the like.

    Not fire related, but I was also once looking for something to pour excess bacon grease in and decided to grab an empty Coke bottle I had on the counter. Thankfully, I put the bottle in the sink while I was pouring so that when it pretty much immediately melted, I didn’t have a mess all over the counter.

    I was thinking his chest looks like an inflatable sumo suit.

    I lived in Wichita for six years. It’s a perfectly fine Midwest city.

    In New York City, where G/O and the author are based, heat and water are often included in rent because the buildings are old and not metered for individual unit use. I’ve seen it once in a newer building, with water, and it was just split up based on that month’s usage. Since it was water, though, it didn’t fluctuate

    I love all these homebuying articles about how Millennials are doing things weird or wacky that cite no actual data and, like, two anecdotes to declare that *THIS IS THE NEW HOTNESS AND WE SHOULD ALL TAKE IT SERIOUSLY.*

    I think the closest thing we have is that our baby gate keeps her from going into the kitchen (there’s an open stairwell on the other side) so we’ve kind of trained her to pick up her trash and dishes because any time she throws something away or rinses her dishes, she gets to go in the kitchen where she’s not allowed

    This is a complicated topic with a bunch of different variables beyond immediate returns, but this math is a little fuzzy:

    These articles come up every month or so and they are all based on the same bad data or faulty interpretations of statistics.

    Now playing

    This reminds me of Summoning Salt’s video on the player trying to get all of the Mario Kart 64 records and the entire community teaming up to stop him. In particular, I like his conclusion,

    My wife and I did Noom for about 3 months. I lost 20 pounds, she lost 15. We’ve kept it off for about 3 months since while backing off the intensity. The “lessons” were fine but nothing truly mind-blowing. I gave up on them after about six weeks or so.

    I think I...hate it? Like, this does not look like a Lego game. Like, it’s Lego. And it’s a video game. But it’s not a Lego game. I just checked, and I’ve played 15 of the 26 licensed Lego games and this just does not seem like what I want in a Lego game.

    Lego games are inherently button mashers. That’s fine. They’re

    I had no idea PS4s were selling for that much or I might not have gifted mine to my nephew this week.

    As a librarian, please let me give you permission to recycle or throw away old books. Every book has a lifespan and it really is okay to let old books go. If you don’t want it, odds are few others do either.

    I’m still not convinced he got it, or passed it on to anybody on the convention floor. Everybody at the convention was required to be vaccinated and masked and New York City has no shortage of things to do and places to go where he also could have been exposed.

    I feel like none of these are really examples of “stunt-casting.” For starters, most of them were not really well known enough to attract a casual audience to a movie for their role (nobody’s watching Raya because of Kelly Marie Tran). Most are just examples of actors being hired for normal roles. Maybe you could

    90% of the examples in this article are not about the Uncanny Valley. The uncanny valley isn’t just bad CGI and it very explicitly is not about any animal. It is about humans and humanoid objects and how we have a strong negative reaction to a humanoid object that looks 90% like a human, but not to one that looks 50%