tim100
iAm
tim100

Two men dressed in pilots’ uniforms walk up the aisle of the aircraft. Both are wearing dark glasses, one is using a guide dog, and the other is tapping his way along the aisle with a cane.

Nervous laughter spreads through the cabin, but the men enter the cockpit the door closes, and the engines start up. The

Jalopnik, Gizmodo, The Root etc etc are equivalent to Us Weekly and other such trash magazines. It is all fluff. There is barely any substance. All of them consistently get facts wrong. Half the time the comment section ends up being the one to edit the final draft of the “article”. It is best to take them all with a

That was a bad joke, but funny. Thanks for the laugh.

This reminds me of one of my favorite plane-related jokes. There are a lot of plane-related jokes, so you know this one has to be good.

There seems to be a lot of conjecture that this can’t support a heavy tv. However, modern TVs weight less than 40-50 lbs and you have eight or more nails holding the bracket. That means each nail only has to support about 5-6 lbs.

There seems to be a lot of conjecture that this can’t support a heavy tv. However, modern TVs weight less than 40-50

I can’t keep quiet about this anymore.

nothing to debate it’s attorneys general

The MPG ratings are a red herring anyway. The way the regulations are written allows for so many loopholes, and the way “traffic calming” measures have been implemented means that even with all the new efficiency available to consumers, fuel consumption per vehicle mile remains essentially flat.

Most automakers have spent the last decade or so harmonizing a good part of their lineups across international markets. There’s no way most of them would suddenly start putting different engines in their cars just because the US suddenly relaxes their emissions standards. Especially when there’s a good chance the

So lets say Trump ends up only bumping that EPA target down by like 1 or 2 mpg, are they still going to fight him in court over that? Because I feel like that would just be petty asf as I see it at least.

I’ve suspected for a while this would turn into a real anti-climax for Democrats who desperately wanted it to turn up a smoking gun. The reality is reasonable people have been horrified with the way the administration reacted primarily because we assumed there wasn’t much substance, which proves even more firmly how

This reporting is just bizarre. The essence is that Trumps statements as related to Comey were validated, despite numerous news articles (i.e. CNN) stating that their anonymous sources “proved” Trump was lying and that Comey never said he wasn’t a target of an investigation.

FA has been morphed from a cool place to ... a political sounding board

I think the thing I’m most irritated about is how FA has been morphed from a cool place to discuss defense and military equipment, strategy, and tactics, into what’s basically a political sounding board - of which the mothership-formerly-known-as-Gawker has many other places to post this rhetoric!

Having seen these glorious bastards work up close early in the Iraq War (‘03), I will always have a big soft mushy spot for the A-10.

Sounds like there were some serious tactical, strategic, logistical, and cranio-rectal problems with the mission planning.

I saw 4 of these flying in formation out of Dover Air Force Base yesterday and it was still cooler than seeing mostly anything else fly out of there.

That would be correct sir. Guilty as charged and proud of it.

Well, it’s the first time he’s managed to withdraw quick enough!

As a senior consultant for a major luxury brand, I take offense to this article. While the details are true (i.e. score indexing, pay scale relativity, importance) regarding CSI, using it as leverage in order to secure a 'better deal' is BS. I would throw a client out of my office for doing that, and refuse to sell