Interesting that you chose to read this as somehow a diss of the women, when I think it is incredibly obvious that the distaste is all for Leo.

Pretending that this was an actual question — it’s a ceremonial role, it used to be William’s. The two of them used to go together to various regimental events. Now that William has to take on a bunch of new ceremonial positions/honorary head of this and that as Prince of Wales, Charles is redistributing the old ones.…

Irreparable harm being a legal term for “outcome I don’t personally care for.”

But protesting outside the house of a Supreme Court Justice is illegal.

“Sisters for Life faces irreparable harm”

I’m going to go out on a limb, and guess assholes

OK, hang on. Is this judge saying that if I’m in the US, any fucking rando on the street has the right to come up on me and have a “close, personal conversation”? And specifically that they can rock right up and get close and personal if they feel compelled to tell me that they don’t agree with how I’m behaving? That…

Delete your account, you unfuckable loser.

Gotta tell ya, I've been to an abortion clinic and the protestors I was escorted past did not present to me like they had " compassionate ears". Maybe they were just hidden from view by the big signs calling me a murderer... Or maybe I couldn't hear the compassion in their voice when they were calling me terrible…

Yep.  I took someone I know to PP for an abortion, and the protestors were all horrible and nasty to her as we walked to the building.  They weren’t trying to have gentle conversations.  They were screaming obscenities.

“If she hadn’t been there to murder a baby, she wouldn’t have been shot! This is about protecting the unborn child!”

I was going to comment that “engaging in close, personal conversations” was never the goal, but you beat me to it. As you say, it’s all about being able to intimidate them with the threat of physical violence.

FTFY

And also see absolutely zero problems outlawing speech they don’t like (Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay law and the innumerable controls put around GOP conventions and the like).

So if legal gun-carrying people feel threatened for their lives as a result of these anti-abortionists screaming things at them and mobbing them while they’re just trying to get health care, would they be off the hook for standing their ground and defending themselves?  Just asking a question. 

mostly just funny how gramps can’t find an attractive lady close to his own age (of which there are plenty) and instead seems to spend his time trolling high school (maybe college) graduation parties to find his next date.  i don’t think anyone is demanding you have a problem with it.

If you let women choose who they want to sleep with, pretty soon those broads will start demanding other things like the right to vote! It’ll be anarchy!

Exactly. I’m tired of hearing about this. They’re both adults, they’re both single, and they’re both consenting. Is it doomed for the short term? Probably, but do any of the women he dates truly believe they’re in for a long term relationship? I’m sure they don’t. Instead, for a couple years they get to party on…

He was hot back in the day. Not a big fan of long hair, but he sure knew how to wear it for that show. My grandmother was also a big fan. :) 

“soap star Lorenzo Lamas”