I wasn’t trying to say these buyers wouldn’t be hauling anything. Of course they’d take “clean” loads. Even decently heavy ones.

The beds won’t be stolen without a LOT of work. It isn’t just a liner, it’s the actual inner panels.

No, you’re not wrong. This isn’t going to see use (in this form at least) on any kind of honest “work truck”. It will be interesting to see if it’s even offered on the subsequent HD models.

There’s your COTD right there... lol

Nobody who’s buying a high end GMC pickup is hauling bulk shit like that.

I own a truck. This is kinda cool (the load stop is actually a great idea), but it’s also INSANELY complicated. I hope they’ve done a ton of durability testing.

And the truth is, if it’s your car you’ll quickly get accustomed to it.

Best. Pirate car ad. EVER.

Is that picture from Used Cars?

They may have pulled back a bit in recent years but they’ve been a huge name in aftermarket.

Don’t get me wrong. I’ve missed BOF SUVs in general and I’m glad the Everest is coming. But it will be a 4-door and it won’t look a thing like that render that’s been floating around forever.

I think you’re exactly right about the new Bronco being a rebadged Everest.

lol pretty much

btw, worth remembering that it wasn’t actually up to Uzi Nissan to be “reasonable” here. He had the domain first and operated a legitimate business from it. Nissan USA didn’t have to be dickish about this and could have tried a good-faith negotiation.

There were some legitimate legal issues involved in the case, and if Nissan had dealt with him in good faith to begin with it could have been resolved quickly.

The fair thing would have been for Nissan to offer him enough cash for the domain that it would more than cover his costs for rebranding.

Had they actually approached him in good faith and shown some respect, they may well have gotten on his good side.

Remember that with a diesel it’s the torque you’re looking at, not the HP

Diesel, eh? Any word on towing capacity?

I have to regrettably go CP on this one.