Disaffected whitebros, silly.

I laughed out loud for real. +1.

With rape, you are talking about an underlying activity (sex) that is made illegal through the absence of consent.

No one blamed the kid for being shot.

You are creating theories where none are needed. NSA / State thought the Secretary of State should be fine conducting both secure and nonsecure business on this bullshit $5000 Windows CE brick, rather than providing her a ‘hardened’ blackberry as they had done for the president. She decided the windows POS was just…

Uh, then what was the server for?

It is an investigation. It is not a criminal investigation.

Yup. And the 2000 disaster birthed 9/11, Iraq, Katrina and - of particular relevance to our current gnashings of teeth - Citizens United.

It’s either ignorantly fatalistic because people think their vote doesn’t matter anyways or unbelievably selfish because people “can’t stomach” voting for someone they don’t agree with 100%.

I think Warren running for president would be viewed much more favorably than Clinton running.

It’s a criminal FBI investigation.

I think it’s his dogs under the control of Rickon or Ghost.

Second guess: Melisandre appears to the lot of them in her true form, unleashes some kind of a spell that incinerates him alive, and then herself dies, her unknown mission at last accomplished.

This is my guess also. Perhaps during the battle, Ramsay is losing, decides to off Rickon, and this happens. It would also retroactively make Ramsay’s killing of his mother-in-law and half-brother a tiny bit less gratuitous.

His written remembrance of Richard Nixon (“He was a crook.”) was a case in point, every bit as merciless as it was in awe of the sheer scale of Nixon’s viciousness and talent for lying. A bracing, horrifying read.

LOL. You’re not. But thanks for playing.

You are probably right. Despite having been in politics for 40 years, he probably has great long term relationships with very few women he would consider hiring as senior staff on a presidential campaign.

“why wouldn’t companies just hire women and save (make more) money?”

Because of sexism. In case you haven’t noticed, corporations are made up of people, and people do not make rational cost-benefit analyses in hiring.

It isn’t. This is precisely the argument that many, and specifically older women (i know, siiiigh, so tedious), have been making.

There has been some progress in the junior ranks. Today there are more female college graduates than male, and organizations doing a somewhat half-decent job at least have women in the rank…

“Yes, Sander’s also has skeletons”

Kudos for acknowledging it. Most would not and would hang you for it.

Indeed. I love when people compare medians and call it a day.