threskos
threskos
threskos

The name Donald Drumpf is just slightly less Dickensian than Wackford Squeers.

This is good to know, but I’m not quite sure why everyone’s so thrilled. It will do NOTHING to his voters. They won’t care. If they don’t care when he insults a disabled person, and veterans and their families, and he stiffs small business owners, they are not going to care — may even praise his accounting acumen —

But has no problem accepting her admission to U Penn and whatever nice law.school she’ll go to while not really ever having to work or work for anything.

No sexism? Did you miss the first 2(...) seasons? I still cringe...

Oh sure, they have an opinion on THIS. But when I can’t decide which Red Robin burger to get, they don’t say a damn thing.

Trump is a racist asshole. No one should vote for him. You all know the reasons why.

Considering their anti-everybody-else stance, why aren’t they simply being up front and calling themselves TrekForHillary?

That’s not how it works. We’re not “making assumptions” and hoping nobody disproves it. That’s just not how science works.

Baby Boomers are also largely in support of fascism, very blindly and ignorantly. This is why the patriot act happened, this is why the “war on terror” is still happening, and why the NSA and TSA are permitted to snoop , and molest people. Because hippy counterculture movement actually grew up into yuppy fascism.

I was with this until the “and don’t vote third party because realistically Trump or Clinton is going to win” thing—because all good fiction teaches us to abandon our ideals and fight for the lesser of two evils, right?

Now playing

Wait I was told that a third party vote is a vote for Hillary, and that to keep her out I had to vote for Trump? So which is it? Is a third party vote a vote for Hillary or Trump? It’s almost like people use that argument to get you to vote for whoever THEY want you to vote for... If I knew better I would almost

God, I’m so happy I don’t live in a swing state. It means I can vote my conscience (in this case, abstaining and only voting in local/state elections) without having to listen to cowardly assholes tell me what a bad person I am for not supporting a candidate who’s going to continue the disastrous “murdering brown

I live in a solidly Blue state that isn’t going to go to Trump no matter how many dissatified voters vote 3rd party. So I’m yeah the idea of me voting for a 3rd party candidate being a vote for Trump is unmitigated bullshit.

Voting for a third party won’t affect social change, yet somehow athletes kneeling before sporting events will? I wonder why the Dems are so afraid of the Perot effect.

“...while the other has devoted her life to public service, and has deep and valuable experience with the proven ability to work with Congress to pass desperately needed legislation.”

It’s pretty remarkable that my non-vote counts twice.

If, as some say, the government is broken, a protest vote will not fix it.

A vote for Johnson is not taking votes away from Clinton, it’s taking votes away from Trump. Quit lumping in Green party votes with Libertarian ones.

I’m still amazed that people can make arguments against a 3rd party with a straight face. How do you think we ended up with these two imbeciles running for president? Because we keep buying into the fallacy that a third party vote is a wasted vote. Here’s a better idea: stop feeding the two party system!

I notice Gul Dukat and Legate Damar are not on this list, but Garak is. Always go with Garak.