It doesn’t matter what you think the discussion is about. The real discussion is what her legal responsibilities are as a teacher, what duties she has to protect children in her care from access to things considered “dangerous” to children (and yes, nude photos are considered dangerous to children) and how we define…

The law considers him a minor child, which he is. Teachers are allowed to have all the stuff they want, but not to allow access to that stuff by the children in her care. He could have taken drugs from her purse, pepper spray, a knife, you name it.. The principle is the same...if we have decided children shouldn’t see…

No. Not the way it works. Teachers have different responsibilities, among them the responsibility to safeguard minors in their care from items society has decided are damaging to minors. By failing to restrict access to nude photographs, she failed her duty of care. She loses not because of the content but the failure…

What if he took a gun from her open purse? He has no right to it, so obviously, he’s 100% responsible, no? No. We charge people in the business of taking care of children with protecting those children from things society has deemed unsuitable. Nude pictures are some of those things that teachers aren't supposed to…

If a kid stole a gun, a knife, or drugs from her purse, you’d be singing a different tune. You’d crush her for failing to keep those items safe. Like it or not, our society has decided that teachers can’t expose minor kids to pronography or (Jesus) nude selfies of teachers. By failing to secure the images, she failed…

She’s not a victim. That’s the problem with your argument. This could be about a knife, a gun, prescription drugs, anything. A teacher is responsible for securing anything deemed dangerous or damaging. Nude photos of herself, made accessible to minor students through her negligence, are considered damaging. We ascribe…

She loses. She didn’t have control of her classroom, so a minor boy got access to her unprotected phone which had nude images of her on it. Trust me, there are a hundred ways she loses.

Every client has their breaking point. You just hope they call you before they drink half a bottle of Scotch and read all the articles Google news can provide about their case. Especially, the legitimately truthful clients. (No clue on this Dr. Luke dude, but he's a dope.)

That's not true. It's true for this media outlet, but certainly not true for, say, the NYT or Washington Post.

If there’s something upon which you can rely, it’s that Jez will utterly misconstrue the status of legal matters or the meaning of rulings. Civil, criminal, probate, doesn’t matter. And, to be honest, it pisses me off. I get that (more or less) there is a default orientation among writers, here (a cynic would suggest…

Except that Bush WAS a warmonger (or enabled them, depending on your view), Obama ISN’T a Muslim, and the Republican establishment is responsible for legislative stagnation.

Not smart stupid. People who have learned a skill, but are still basically stupid. If you somehow manage to reach adulthood and haven't figured out the evolution isn't a big con, that the laws the govern us are different from the tenets of your religion and that the bible isn't the last word on women's rights, the…

I think it's proof that a surprising number of people are complete idiots.

I’m sure they have, but the other thing I’m sure they thought of is that it’s not just sales with advertising, it’s brand awareness. Though you may not believe it, the incremental decreases in sales relative to decreased or eliminated ad spending aggregate. After a few years, (even assuming no shareholders revolt and…

Not at first...my comprehension was a little off. But, it could work (badly).

Like every NBA coach...good with the smoke and mirrors.

Fast is a function of training. You focus a white kid on fast twitch and speed, and he'll motor.

REad the imdb page...he's been working consistently for 25 years and has been in several features, recently. He's also got one coming out, soon.

Truth

Funny. Play in the NBA and NFL evolved with changes in the physical size , speed and techniques of players. The hard men of yore in the NFL would get trucked by today’s players. Today’s NBA players can shoot the lights out (some of them). It's also kind of hard to preach defense when 140-128 scores were totally common…