thomasservo
Thomas Servo
thomasservo

Yeah, I think what Luke really wants is you using comments on his goodbye posts to rehash the tired complaints you’ve all been harassing him and his colleagues with for a decade or more.

You mean Satan raping Jonah Hill? Doesn’t seem unfunny.

Never let a controversial issue go by without letting everyone know exactly what a person like you thinks!

You’re a fantastic advocate for your point of view.  Please keep this up.

Is this ChatGPT?

at a random point during the film, “an image of a partially undressed woman appeared on screen for several seconds before being removed”.

It’s a weird game. There’s a lot of cool scifi/dystopian worldbuilding, buried under dull tropes and broad humour. I can easily see an adaptation improving on the source material, let alone working at all.

The ‘12 year old who’s actually a 700 year old demon therefore it’s not pedophilia’ is exactly the example I thought of when I read this. Yes, in both that case and this one with the bear shape-shifter the mind inside that body is informed enough to consent. But it’s pretty hard to get around the idea that anyone

This is the first time I’m seeing her boyfriend’s face and. . . he needs to lower his goddamned voice. 

Always happy to see another story about a new generation of gamers ascending to the idea that everything they considered “good” about a game was actually everything BUT gameplay. Coming up with classic JRPGs, and wishing they were more action-oriented, it was Ocarina of Time that did it for me; realized just how much

I can see a major plot twist coming: the girl you accidentally end up protecting in the future is actually your daughter! 

Lmfao she’s barely even pudgy.

Creed? Also I still say The Force Awakens is great but I understand that’s not a popular opinion on the internet

Pancaked by a drunk dump truck driver. Just like Tiny Dinky Daffy (may he rest in peace)

Sorry, best they can do is a Waterworld reboot.  Basically the same, right?

How come I never see comments like this on, say, articles about Into The Spider-Verse? Like if you’re really going to police what Kotaku covers, be consistent about it.

Some multi-millionaire who is one of the most famous people on the internet and built his career on doing expensive stunts and is using a stunt to focus more attention on himself, yes, and Kotaku has an article about it because that’s what Kotaku does.  Are you new here?

I think you draw the line by not differentiating based on who they are. You act like human life is worth saving, you expend the resources you reasonably have available while the odds are good they can be recovered, and hope for the best. It shouldn’t matter if those are scientists, migrants, or idiot rich people with

Yes, but I highly doubt they would tweet that they found the debris field of the Titanic. They are tweeting this because they found the debris field of the Titan’s implosion.