thomas-hinkemeyer
-Tom-
thomas-hinkemeyer

I couldnt even take time to process his shitty attempt at a scientific experiment because I was too focused on what youre saying.

I would agree with the aesthetics over all else with a note, its the exact opposite. Its like the Prius and many of the other “green” cars, they’re deliberately ugly so smug environmentally pious people can go “look, I care about the environment so much that I’m willing to drive this ugly thing!”

Something I praised

You got me. I had a derp moment. I also think the world forgets the inline 6 Mustang, Slant 6 Challenger, and L26 Camaro......A MUSCLE CAR WITH A 140hp 6 cylinder??!?@?!?!?!??@.!!!111!

For the record, the 3.6L Pentastar V6 has been at 305hp since the Challengers release.

Your height complaint, youre already in the 97+ percentile of people...then admit youre differently proportioned which probably puts you into an even smaller percentile of people. They cant make a car that fits everyone. I also tend to drive smaller vehicles, heck first gen neons are one of my favorites but I most

Isnt vehicle “size” defined by interior space and not exterior space? Like a Bentley Continental is technically a mid-sized car?

Weighty car or not it does what its designed to do really well, soak up highway miles and be fun from stoplight to stoplight.

I dont know where youre getting the Challenger and Camry power figures from. The Challenger V6 is 305 vs the Camry 301.

Next, the Scat Pack starts at $36,890 and offers 485hp from the standard 392 Hemi...so your mustang GT argument doesnt look all that fantastic. Comparing cars like the Focus RS isnt really great

I’m 6'2" and have had zero headroom issues in a Challenger, sunroof or otherwise. Also, it doesnt handle like a pig, it handles like the GT car that it is. I’ve driven a 3.6L V6, Scat Pack 392, and Hellcat. All handled as one would expect from a +4000lb GT car....its not a Lotus Elise, its a freeway flyer/stoplight

I dont know why the internet hates the Challenger so much. Its basically been the same platform for what, 11 years? And it was a Mercedes E Class platform before that?

All these same keyboard warriors will blast Chrysler for working out a platform and making it bulletproof will in the same breath praise Ford for the

That was my first immediate thought “Oh Jaguar poached Audis design team...”

That Coronet is amazing.

Wheres a chunk of spark plug ceramic when you need it?

Its hard to give a review when youre dead.

Yeah but you are starting with an already developed platform....slap a new body on it, redo the interior to be more sporty, less luxurious, then retune the suspension...

I dunno, its a close tie with the MKIV Supra hoop....hoopra....

I would have complained a hell of a lot less about a high strung V8 than a badge engineered BMW...

Lexus LC500 would have been the PERFECT platform to start from.

a $4500 supercharger kit will cure ALL of your FR86LMNOPQBRZ woes

There was money to build a poor selling luxury coupe, the LC500...but there wasnt money to build a sports coupe on the platform and call it the Supra...

How?