thiswasnotmyfirstchoice
thiswasnotmyfirstchoice
thiswasnotmyfirstchoice

eh, 20 years ago me and my twentysomething office crew were all going WAZZZZUPPPP?!?!!? It’s a phase.

I love seeing these kinds of intraconference shadefests. (As a Browns fan, that and watching the Steelers lose in the playoffs are the only joy I get from the NFL any more.)

I have to confess I let out a brief scream when Coleman let that ball go through his hands. Otherwise, same.

That individual is a troll formerly known as Tomato Face. Always trolls with a tomato-related nym.

Yeah and it’s not like the fallout from a campaign of false accusations would make their reputation any worse. What’ve they got to lose?

I have to admit, something about the original piece seemed off to me. Maybe my radar needs to go into the shop, but something about it didn’t ring true to me. I can’t explain why, or why (for instance) I pretty quickly landed on a “they’re telling the truth and he needs to resign” position with Franken.

Emma, putting up a Van Morrison clip makes you a quality human being. Putting one up from one of his most underrated albums makes you a top 10 human.

Glorified contact list. Useful for reunions etc.

Man, she could’ve just asked me and I’d have told her not to bother; my Napalm Dick line of cologne was a complete flop.

Yeah if you’re not getting a flu shot because you’re generally healthy/the shot’s not 100% effective, and you’re unfamiliar with the concepts of passive carriers or herd immunity, then you’re acting like a garbage human being and you probably voted for Donald Trump.

I’m a guy and had a similar thing in college. I felt awful afterwards, like “was I leading him on? I hope I didn’t hurt his feelings!”

When I was dating my now-wife there was a (married) woman who kept wanting to get together for “help” with something I was good at. Wife was like “SHE’S TOTALLY COMING ON TO YOU WHY CAN’T YOU SEE THAT” and I was like nah she just needs some help with this thing! Once we got engaged I literally never heard from her

Naming the institution but not the accused may be a good workaround.

Yeah that piece is holding up real well, it already seems 20 years old.

IIRC (I may not) that’s what happened. The NYT had a chance to publish it, passed/sat on it, he took it to the New Yorker and then the Times was like “must publish first!”