Well, you consider yourself wrong, then. I mean, you DID read your own comment, right? Because anyone who so casually dehumanizes entire groups of people or would advocate depriving another individual of their reproductive rights is a real scumbag.
Well, you consider yourself wrong, then. I mean, you DID read your own comment, right? Because anyone who so casually dehumanizes entire groups of people or would advocate depriving another individual of their reproductive rights is a real scumbag.
As Mitch Hedberg would say, “Here, YOU throw these away.”
Yeah, the headline of the article is indisputable, but the body of the article kind of focuses on an ancillary conclusion that is not well-justified.
Wow. You’re kind of a scumbag.
There are inherent contradictions here. Women feel like they don’t meet society’s beauty standards but don’t blame men? Tomato, tomahto. I’m not disputing the headline of the article, just the claimed distinction between the object of these hurt feelings.
Surmise?
Women get called much worse, much more often. Baby steps, I guess.
Had wells fargo savings account since I was like 5 and they’ve never charged a fee. Ditto the checking and credit accounts I later opened. Is there still any reason for me to leave them?
Cool hyperbole, bro.
I’m gonna one-up you on the ignorant comments, because every time I read the term “pansexual” I think it means they want to fuck a goat.
“Later, she’s shown eating a salad at work, only to desperately pull open a secret drawer full of sweet snacks and then puke in the bathroom.”
I don’t mean to diminish or distract from your own experience, but the above statement is absolutely false. As a guy who’s been told a few too many times that, “You’re a really great guy. You’re the nicest guy I’ve ever met. You deserve to be happy. You can do better, anyway,” I can anecdotally confirm that women are…
The problem is that he’s actually and obviously smarter than them and it threatens them.
Sciencey question: how could a test determine whether elevated levels of testosterone in a woman were naturally produced or the result of drug treatment?
That’s a great point.
He did.
Why does she deserve that recognition? Because she’s dead? Because she’s a woman? Because she’s a tangential celebrity? The irony is that the detectives who actually worked the case are getting absolutely NO credit. What are their names?
Fuck Patton Oswalt. His wife didn’t want “shine” but he can’t shut the fuck up all over social media and television about how crucial she apparently wasn’t in solving this case. Meanwhile, the ones who are ACTUALLY humble and not trying to steal the spotlight are the cops whose names we don’t even know that actually…
They did give her credit for exactly that: raising the profile of the case in recent years.
The crimes, committed in the late 70's and early 80's weren’t even linked until 2000 by DNA evidence, because the police around the state were working on the case the whole fucking time. McNamara didn’t even become interested in the case until 2007 and doesn’t name him as a suspect in her book. They were tailing him…