Yeah, typical...lotta rhetoric, lotta bias, and not even a stitch of evidence or a single example to support your nonsense. Show me the white women “always telling women of color to stfu.” Show me the women of color working to progress “issues which disproportionately benefit white women.”

Drawing conclusions? The articles relies primarily on the girl’s videotaped interview, published essays, and saved social media communications. Of course conclusions about her state of mind can be drawn from that evidence.

I appreciate your response and I hope that my own does not come across as dismissive. I know it’s not strictly a semantics issue, but I still don’t see how the women’s march can be interpreted as a march for, specifically, white women’s issues. I have yet to see this discrepancy explained in any kind of detail.

Of course, and I would add that he’s a sicko who definitely deserves time in prison. I just had to mention that story because it was really weird. And her writing was unbelievably bad.

Your comment didn’t generate a lot of suggestions, did it? Because nobody here really cares about getting people on the same page, and nobody here really wants your help. People just like to complain, loudly, when they feel that they’ve been excluded (or included, but not enough to their satisfaction). Oh, my bad,…

So, white women are horrible for supposedly telling black women to stfu and the solution to this is for white women to stfu? Sounds easy. Makes sense.

If I get a hundred people together to go to a football game and a couple people sit there talking about hockey the whole time, I probably tell them to stfu, too. I feel like if I went to a “Women’s March” I would expect to be talking about “Women’s,” full stop. It ain’t easy getting so many people on the same page;…

You have been told a self-serving lie by a biased observant.

I guess you gotta pick an issue, then, and agree ahead of time if you’re all marching about sexism or racism or sexism with a racist dynamic or racism with a sexist dynamic. They’re all good to protest against, I guess, just get on the same page, people.

So what’s the hierarchy of oppression, and in what sequence should people deign to speak out against it? Do you suggest that first, everyone stfu about their own issues and advocate for black women, then everyone stfu about themselves and advocate for black men, followed by white women, etc, etc?

Meh. I’m not a blame the victim type, but I don’t think there was really a victim here. Go read the story in dailymail...it seemed like a definite pattern of behavior for the girl, who reached out to him on twitter specifically for the lols and to then be able to write some pretentious and plagiary-filled essays…

So, the whole theory is based on the doors and side mirrors, and then the theory culminates with a diagram showing how the doors and side mirrors wouldn’t be necessary anyway? Good theory! Good reporting!

How the fuck is it NOT a sex crime? From the minute the story broke it was obvious he knew the girl was underage. I don’t trust people who want to interpret every convicted pervert as some kind of martyr.

So, these idiot trump supporters will eventually realize what idiots they are unless we attack them for being idiots in which case they will further entrench themselves in their idiocy instead of feeling humbled and ashamed of being idiots.

A dumbass response, you trolling fuck.

I don’t see it.

Trump’s base are not big NBA fans.

Moron, nobody was protesting FOR HILLARY, they were protesting AGAINST TRUMP.

Alright...frankly I don’t think that was racist, and at some point the interpretation is more problematic than the intent. He was saying her opponent was intimidated by the way she rushed the net. It doesn’t seem racist to me. My favorite go-to road-rage curse is to call other drivers “Stupid monkey motherf-ers,”…

STFU. Don’t put words in Trump’s mouth, especially when those words are too complicated for the shithead to even understand.