thisisnotaninternetmeme--disqus
thisisnotaninternetmeme
thisisnotaninternetmeme--disqus

I hope you told him that you occasionally fantasized about his balls being removed.

We're talking about people who aren't nude models and porn stars, people who do not intend to have their photos viewed in this way, which as such raises issues of consent to me, which I take very seriously.

Sexualizing the people in your life is generally shitty, cheap, and/or gross. Nude models and pornstars, on the other hand, fully expect their images to be viewed erotically. They actually CONSENT to being objectified in this fashion, or in being used as a stimulus/focal point for someone's erotic pleasure.

I'm confused, Archmage - I would consider what one fantasizes about while masturbating as part of someone's sex life. Absolutely agree with the second sentence, of course.

People don't want to eat ethically, fine, but they're hurting animals needlessly. People don't want to engage in sex ethically, that's not fine, that's a big problem and it's people that they're hurting.

I place a high value on having respect for people I'd like to have sex with. I already have a lot of respect for people regardless of whether I'd like to have sex with them, but that respect only increases the more attractive I think someone is. And unless an actress is doing a scene in which she is trying to be

Yes, and also it really should have been "not doing yourselves any favours." Just because you're posting something disrespectful doesn't mean you can't have pluralize pronouns that are referring to plural nouns.

I tend to do a lot things that those "nice, sensitive guys" do. I have no problem looking at women - but when I look at an attractive woman, I don't fantasize about her, and I don't stare. I had a lot of platonic female friends in college, and the manner in which many women look at men is respectable - they tend give

He has a telltale shimmer

*triangular laser sight slowly tracks its way up Mr. Hansen's body*

It's that kind of outsourcing that cost us the election!

There is no punchline. When you're looking at a scene and realize that the image has a woman's backside in jeans at the bottom of the frame, they frame has been composed so you can look at a women's ass. It doesn't matter what the emotional content of the scene: go check out that hottie's ass, yo. It's disrespect,

I hope, in the end, that they defeat the beast by firing the boy directly into the Predator's chest, like the Fonz trying to break through a wall with his head. He can wear a helmet and everything.

At some point in your life, you should actually try looking at the eyes and the expression on the faces of porn actresses. And unless it's a scene/actress that involves actual acting, you should delete any videos where the look on her face indicates that she's not enjoying herself. I wasn't even 20 by the time I made

The male gaze: when two actors are in a dramatic scene together, and you realize that the woman has a very nice, ample bosom which is perfectly in the lower right corner of the frame, so that your follow the line of her face to, basically, stare right at her rack.

Many congratulations to you for your resilience and perspective. It's inspirational, and we're gonna need a lot of that over the coming years.

It's the most logical conclusion, really.

You can tell them about all those great shows that only got 1 or 2 seasons, and then you can talk to them in depth about Most Dangerous Catch, Duck Dynasty, and Kate Plus 8

A few nice things for me to catch up on. Not bad at all, although tbh, a ton of good stuff left at the start of (iirc) November and December, and I don't think they've made up for it. Idk that Avengers 3: Captain America Civil Union counts.

Thank you, sorry! First name, Francis, right? That's what I get for talking about a movie I haven't watched in like 20 years.