thischarminggoodmancharliebrown
ThisCharmingGoodManCharlieBrown
thischarminggoodmancharliebrown

Age of Ultron did the transition just right. They gave each new character many chances to shine and grow throughout the films, so that when the well established and loved mainstream favorites left, it felt completely natural to have this new team take their place. No shoehorning, no forced or pandering diversity, just

Thanks for proving my point!

It really doesn’t. It only makes for the replacement always be a secondary patch. Like how Peter Parker will always be Spiderman, everyone else is just some other guy. It will never let X-23 become her own character, and that’s the problem. Longtime fans will dislike her because it cost them Wolverine, and new fans

Oh, great, the “safe spaces in comics” argument. You do know that people can dislike killing off established characters for diversity purposes and not be raging misogynists? In fact, the whole “everyone who doesn’t agree with this change hates *insert minority/gender*” argument is such a wet fart that it’s lost any

It’s almost as if creating new female characters is a completely insane idea that would never work.

The idea that Batman is multiple people, and more of a symbol than one person, is not new to the comics. Same with The Flash. It’s been established years, even decades ago, and has had multiple alternate storylines relating to this. Killing off a character and replacing them wholesale with a different gender because

Oh, you speak for all women now? Wonderful.

The multiplayer is fantastic, and it really feels like Fahey is intentionally selling it short. The traversal is nothing like Advance Warfare, and far more akin to Titanfall in style. The maps are actually bigger than ever before, including hidden routes, swimming, and actually forcing players to stop camping for

What’s that Call of Duty? You’re actually delivering three distinctive game modes, each totally worthy of being their own full title with support and DLC incoming for months to come? What? And you’re including a long campaign with local and online co-op? That’s actually worth re-playing? And you’re including active,

Would you call someone who drives a car casually a petrol head? How about someone that has gone target shooting once a gun enthusiast? Would you call the casual cinema goer a cinephile? Or someone who reads the occasional Dan Brown on the tube a bibliophile?

The first Jurassic Park wasn’t that good on science either. As someone who wasn’t a kid when they first saw Park, it’s much easier to look at World and see it as a true equal to Spielberg’s great adventure film. Both have loopy and broken science, questionable character choices, and silly plot contrivances - yet both

By “some” don’t you mean the vast majority that enjoyed the film?

It is not the filmmaker, it is the studio and marketing department, and their job is only to tell the basic setting, present some set pieces, and tell you who is starring in it. In this case they don’t even need that, as it’s a selling point based on brand recognition. Really, it’s not that difficult to understand.

But oh enlightened one, please, help us, for we cannot understand how this old opinion piece which gets basic mundane facts wrong has any bearing on a project years later where Abrams isn’t the writer, nor the producer, and is spearheaded by a team of people unrelated to the problems said opinion blogger has. Oh most

If you honestly think most movies are worse than their trailers, then that sounds more like a personal problem. A trailer has to sell the most basic idea, the simplest, easiest to understand concept to get audiences in the theaters. If you’re going to judge an entire massive production based off this, then that’s not

It’s a good thing that they don’t have to anymore make actual feature films, when astute members of the society such as yourself can deduce their entire quality off a two minute advertisement.

I didn’t see any crafting in the trailer, way to ruin the source material Duncan Jones!

Oh mighty one, please help us masses wandering in the dark - we are but humble in our confusion, as that article is nearly three years old, and holds absolutely no relevance to who, and what, is on display today. Please, confide in us with some intel that is actually relevant, for we are utterly at a loss at how one

Oh mighty bastion of knowledge, I bow in the presence of one deemed with such esteemed insider information - please, tell us of these elusive facts that you have deduced, and explain thy knowledge of Abrams, and how he is most certainly doing something of foul trickery based on these trailers, oh one of towering

So... are they adding her to the relatively long list of realistic looking videogame women? Cause last I remember, there are quite a few of those already.