I believe his accusers, now that there are accusers.

so, so, so NOT BINGO. everyone is running to defend themselves for plugging their ears and not showing one shred of doubt where there was damn good reason to be suspicious. TEAM JEZEBEL ALL THE WAY ON THIS ONE.

Especially, if your career is on the line, and all that stuff. I still think Jezebel handled it correctly, in terms of doing due diligence, it’s just unfortunate that Kirkman came under fire. This is part of why people don’t often come forward with this shit.

I don’t even think it was malicious. Just, “FUCK MAN WHY ARE PEOPLE YELLING AT ME ABOUT THIS? WHAT, JEZEBEL SAID WHAT NOW? FUCK YOU JEZEBEL”. A totally understandable response when you’re under fire.

Here’s the simple fact: It’s The New York Times

It seems to me that you handled things very well, with Jen Kirkman. It’s unfortunate, if I had to guess, I’d say I think she was just frazzled by how much scrutiny she got, and lashed out at you guys. But you all did your job. This shit’s tough!

Yes, but should he be MORE in prison??? Tune in to Hannity tonight!

This is how Anita Hill ended up in front of the Senate: she told coworkers about Clarence Thomas when it happened, rumors circulated, the FBI heard about it and sought her out. But history doesn’t remember it that way, because all we want to do is ruin these guys’ lives...

This part of the NYTimes story is important, because of what it implies:

If you read the story, none of the women actually came forward. The reporters had heard the rumors about his behavior and went in search of the victims. In fact, the victims were initially reluctant to go one the record.

I don’t give a fuck about Louis C.K. and if he’s an asshole who goes down for asshole behavior great.

How would this be an ambush, though? As mentioned elsewhere, the Times would have called him for comment. I’m also seeing on Twitter that other people in Hollywood have been contacted by the Times over the past couple of weeks. I think he at least has an idea what the subject of the story is.

It’s not an ambush - the NYT would have called his camp on all of the pieces they’re about to report. They KNOW the substance of the story given what he’s been asked to confirm or deny.

More like a kazoo.

So Kelly had the opportunity to cancel TPS himself when he was Secretary of DHS but didn’t do it. Now he wants Duke to cancel TPS so his handpicked successor at DHS won’t have to do it. Kelly is a four star coward and an asshole.

Trump is easier to play than a fiddle.

Make no mistake. That outfit is mandated by the Trump family. It’s to keep “servants” in line and to remind them that while they may be close to power, they are merely staff.

Dozens of old people will see this magazine at their doctors offices and be extremely appalled in like three weeks.

Maybe it’s just me but I find it odd to use slang terms like cocks and dicks in an article about a serious issue.

Oh, come on now, we all know that you don’t need a plane or a chopper to reach the top of their pyramid.