I live in BFE, all of the cars are 1996 or older, only one carries comprehensive, no outstanding loans on any of them and my husband is 46 years old. It's kind of nice.

Bah! You've ruined my dreams!

The E30 in the M colors is very nice. Oh, yes.

Bwahahahahahahaha. Nice.

And the paychecks to the people that build them stays here in the US.

Remember that any house attached to or on the same property as a church can properly be called a rectory. Lutheran, Episcopalian, Southern Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian...

I would love to live in an old rectory. They're often humongous old houses, with high ceilings, way too many bedrooms, wood floors, a library with glass-doored book cases, and large basements, closets, and attics full of cool old crap, since at most churches, nothing gets thrown away, ever, for fear old Mrs. Viola…

It's Finland, ergo it's cold.

That's really well said.

>"You hadn't learned the proper technique to make it shift smoothly (dammit!)."

The question was "worst car", not "the most morally questionable from an environmental standpoint car"

Yeah, the Cruze has absolutely nothing to do with Daewoo or the Cobalt. Completely different car.

They cleaned up the Sebring and slapped a new badge on it. They did not redesign the car from the bottom up.

Crosstour: Built in Ohio. Corolla: built in the US.

"...You want a car that isn't crude, ugly, rough-riding, and noisy."

Sounds like it's time to go insurance-shopping!

That's because it's an STi, not because of the area.

Amen. When I lived in Milwaukee, there was one huge freeway curve that had a decreasing radius. Us locals could always spot the out of towners getting caught out by that curve!

>And mostly it seems like the people - end users - are to blame.

>Knowing Saabs have never been known for superior reliability,