It's nice that your kids are successful, but his post is reasonable and accurate. "Reality off the coasts" is irrelevant — most kids at these schools are not applying for internships in Ohio.
It's nice that your kids are successful, but his post is reasonable and accurate. "Reality off the coasts" is irrelevant — most kids at these schools are not applying for internships in Ohio.
It is never worthwhile to stay in and bill more hours. Calculate what that extra hour will earn you (protip: probably nothing, because you are salaried and your bonus is probably lockstep). Then, reflect on the lifestyle you're leading. Also, if that's how you talk to your friends, you sound like a passive…
Colbert's segment was pretty much entirely about the Redskins, and threw in "...Foundation for Orientals" as a clear and hilarious punchline. This article is primarily about (and the headline is explicitly about) the Twitter backlash, not the Redskins foundation. The headline is hamhanded and gratuitous, and…
What are they trying to satirize? I get Colbert's satire: it's directed at "Redskins." What is Deadspin making fun of? IMO the headline is unnecessary, especially given Gawker's general sanctimonious attitude towards ironic/irreverent usage of these terms in other situations.
He also says "whites" plenty of times, though I'm reluctant to do too close a linguistic analysis of an essay that is not exactly written with any coherent regard for language.
There's a decent chance that a football player at UNC taking an AfAm studies class is, himself, black.
There's a decent chance that a football player at UNC taking an AfAm studies class is, himself, black.