Why would visibility be bad? The ride height is higher than most other trucks, and if its like the Model 3, with the dashboard gone, you have a much wider view of the road.

Ah, no. Someone who has a valid counter argument doesn’t need to resort to childish name calling. It is precisely because their argument is weak that they resort to such. Cause they feel like they can lower the value of your argument simply by lowering your position.

“Nothing stopping Tesla team at our car plant from voting union. Could do so tmrw if they wanted. But why pay union dues & give up stock options for nothing? Our safety record is 2X better than when plant was UAW & everybody already gets healthcare.”

Do you have any reports of Tesla chargers being decommissioned due to lack of paying rent? I haven’t seen any. Only time I’ve seen chargers decommissioned is due to repair or if they are moving the charger to a different location. (And even then a decommissioned charger is extremely rare)

Moore’s law never existed in the first place. As Intel put it, they achieved Moore’s law through effort.

This isn’t exactly true. It is risky sure, but the gains are also worth quite a ton. The problem is many people think you just stick in a battery in a gas car and get an electric car, but that isn’t the case.

Gross profit margin is part of GAAP accounting, if you think it isn’t you either don’t know GAAP accounting or are on purpose playing word games to focus on the “per unit” aspect. But even then you are still wrong, because the average of per unit profit is essentially still the gross profit margin.

You are just ignoring facts just cause you don’t like them. (Trying to use personal accusations to try to undermine the argument is a sign that you know what I said is right and have no counter argument)

Ah, yes, because Q3 and Q4 was sold in US, with short delivery times. In Q1 and Q2, they started international deliveries which increased delivery times.

It’s not per unit, it’s on average, but it amounts to about that per unit.

They actually made 18.9% GAAP gross profit on each one they sold according to the financial data.

The problem with Navigant Research is their methodology is highly flawed. I remember back in the day when they did one for batteries.

I think you have some reading comprehension issues jim.

It’s a bit more complex than that, a lot of Tesla’s volatility is due to short sellers spreading fake news or targeting Tesla via PR to tank Tesla’s stock. (Which is against SEC rules, just the SEC doesn’t really care when people break SEC rules or not)

Nonsense, they were holding back european and chinese sales due to full tax credit expiring in US. So now they focus on Europe and China.

Neutral: The question is silly, Tesla is sending cars to Europe and China, which is impacting deliveries in the US.

I ain’t Elon, but if you are willing to give me a few billion dollars, I can become Elon. How does that sound?

Tesla did not have any layoffs, they had firings due to employees failing their performance review. If you paid attention, Tesla ends up with MORE employees after these mass firings. Because they hire more than they fire.

The problem with hydrogen is it is extremely flammable. It will ignite at a leak from static electricity. Worse yet you can not see the flame in sunlight only a heat shimmer in the air.

That makes absolutely no sense. The lawsuit back in august the judge threw out because there was no case. The FBI was investigating this months ago but judging the FBI stopped following up with Tesla pretty much makes it clear the case is already long closed. (And if I remember correctly, SEC also investigated this…