The problem with Navigant Research is their methodology is highly flawed. I remember back in the day when they did one for batteries.

I think you have some reading comprehension issues jim.

It’s a bit more complex than that, a lot of Tesla’s volatility is due to short sellers spreading fake news or targeting Tesla via PR to tank Tesla’s stock. (Which is against SEC rules, just the SEC doesn’t really care when people break SEC rules or not)

Nonsense, they were holding back european and chinese sales due to full tax credit expiring in US. So now they focus on Europe and China.

Neutral: The question is silly, Tesla is sending cars to Europe and China, which is impacting deliveries in the US.

I ain’t Elon, but if you are willing to give me a few billion dollars, I can become Elon. How does that sound?

Tesla did not have any layoffs, they had firings due to employees failing their performance review. If you paid attention, Tesla ends up with MORE employees after these mass firings. Because they hire more than they fire.

The problem with hydrogen is it is extremely flammable. It will ignite at a leak from static electricity. Worse yet you can not see the flame in sunlight only a heat shimmer in the air.

That makes absolutely no sense. The lawsuit back in august the judge threw out because there was no case. The FBI was investigating this months ago but judging the FBI stopped following up with Tesla pretty much makes it clear the case is already long closed. (And if I remember correctly, SEC also investigated this…

There is nothing dodgy at all. They had a blow out quarter due to profit margins on the Model 3. They already started to have a mild profit margins on the Model 3 in Q2 so those margins growing in Q3 as they scaled and improved efficiency is nothing shocking.

If you were a stock holder and followed Tesla, you would…

They do have quite a history of making inaccurate claims concerning Tesla before.

By the sound of things they pulled out a closed investigation to create worry to stop the stock’s momentum. The timing seems too good, and in most cases a reputable source wouldn’t publish something like this until they have some definite information. They don’t even have any comment from the FBI.

Misrepresentation of build rate is when you claim you built 5000 cars but in reality built 4000 cars.

This isn’t about misrepresenting of build rates but making a claim that Tesla knew they couldn’t meet their projections yet made their claims that they would.

Sounds like a coordinated effort to stop the stock from continuing to rise.(considering the timing)

1st Gear: I think the improving financials and profitability in sight had more to do with the share price bump than the apology.

Fossi is the lawyer and director for Stewart Rahr’s tax avoidance foundation. Rahr made his billion by scamming the American medical system through overcharging for drugs.

The issue here is that he failed and someone called him out on it.

General Motors Burton, Fairfax, and Lansing have higher DART rates than Tesla Fremont, so does Ford Rouge, Dearborn, Brookpark, Claycomo, Woodhaven, and Wayne, where is the sky falling Mr. Felton?  Subaru Lafayette has 1/5th the lost time. Why are UAW plants so damn dangerous?

That may be the case, but it doesn’t mean that they are faultless.