About time this was brought up and I am again shocked that Shillings is the one to do it!

That is the AWD model. i3X doesn’t even have AWD option and is RWD only. RWD Model Y is gonna be out soon which will have more range and cheaper.

50k is for LR AWD. The LR RWD will probably go for around 45k. The i3X which is RWD goes for 68k euroes, which is 78k USD.

Can you explain your logic? The i3X is RWD 460km range on the wltp. The Tesla Model Y LR RWD is 541 km range. That is 81km difference.

Because the specs are a joke for 2020? I mean you are aware BMW is quoting WLTP range, not EPA range right? So expect the range to be smaller if it does make it to the US.

Except Ford’s waiting list is a lie. I wouldn’t be surprised if the day you go to pick up your Bronco, you find it already sold to someone who didn’t even reserve.

1) Reservations does not generate revenue

2) As we learned with other Ford products, the reservations from Ford are completely useless. That is because the dealer is the one who sells them. And if someone offers to pay more than you, then your reservation goes out the window.

The reports are pretty standard, you don’t need to dig through multiple pages. They are pretty lined up. And Tesla generally mentions GAAP numbers in same line as non-GAAP for years.

The EU’s laws kind of make box trucks the requirement as they limit the length of the truck.

Weren’t you doing quarters? Now you are jumping to years? Again, why not talk about Q3 and Q4? Oh right, it doesn’t fit into your narrative!

I really wonder how people ever got the idea that most trucks somehow go cross country or something?

You still believe that myth? Tesla made a profit even without the credits in Q3 and Q4.

Why not talk about Q3 and Q4 instead? Or it won’t fit into your narrative?

Tesla has ALWAYS reported GAAP numbers. If you bothered reading your own article, what happened was this. In May 2016, the SEC passed NEW guidance that simply requires you to state GAAP numbers on the 1st page of your earning release. They were 1 quarter late to comply hence the SEC made a comment on that as part of…

1) When has he ever sold a product that didn’t exist? Every product he sold he delivered despite haters like you saying he won’t.

Pyramid scheme? I don’t think you even know what half those words actually mean...

They are NOT misleading people, YOU are misleading people. There is a difference.

It’s not the the scientists and top universities are wrong, the problem is quoting their statements out of context without understanding their actual meanings.

Sorry, but I don’t bite. What are their assumptions based on? Vehicles going at higher speed would matter a lot less if they all run on renewable energy.

It isn’t. It’s the confusion between gross emissions and net emissions that confuses people.