Sorry, that is total BS because:

The thing people need to understand is that there is a difference between “damaging the environment” and “blocking my view”. Often times people seem to confuse the two and that creates the delusion that we should sacrifice progress for the sake of the ever changing aesthetics.

Since when is the night sky a “natural resource”? The night sky is the night sky, it isn’t an object or something that is consumed.

The latency may be as low as below 20ms.

Why would they be forced to drive a 50k EV? Plenty of EV choices in the 30k-40k range for new with over 200 miles range and you can buy even cheaper used.

CA gives incentives to low incomes for EVs, and the low cost per mile and low maintenance costs would benefit them overall.

So if I come to a diesel pump and try to fill up a gasoline car and it doesn’t work, that means gasoline cars are in beta? They don’t need to all use the same port, simply the stations should be able to accommodate multiple ports, and many of them do.

The biggest mistake you are making is trying to make EVs like gas cars, that is like trying to breed your horseless carriage, an exercise in ignorance.

Nope, CA has passed laws that give larger incentives to poor people to buy electric. And the low cost per mile and low maintenance cost would benefit them.

I think the biggest issue here is your ignorance of the tech, not the immaturity.

What in the world are you talking about? What 100% EV agenda? None CARBs requirements require 100% EVs. They allow for multiple technologies, EVs being one of them. All they care about is that pollution levels are lowered regardless the tech and set deadlines to do so, none of which are over night.

Biojet fuel, hydrogen for airplanes would require to cryogenicly freeze it.

1) The problem again is the lack of electrons in the water means it’ll pull electrons from other compounds, in some cases even breaking down their bonds.

I get the feeling FCA will be joining Sergio really really soon...

And I responded to that poster that his deduction was inaccurate.

You are confused, I am not talking about deminiralized water which is sometimes called dionized water but not the same thing. The confusion is because one of the process of removing minerals from water is called dionization.

And what do you think hydrogen is made of? Rainbows and unicorns?

I’m talking about tail pipe emissions, you know, comparing apples to apples.

V3 superchargers are becoming more and more common, we are talking about the future right? Not the present. Even in the present, I wouldn’t be surprised if there were more v3 superchargers than hydrogen stations.

If you read my comments, I at no point claimed a 1 solution fits all. As I clarified, BEVs can handle the majority, and anything it can’t can be filled in with biomethane in plugin-hybrid form. Biomethane is cheaper than hydrogen and infrastructure is already there and can be the stop gap for the niches hydrogen can…