Except you aren’t factoring in a few MAJOR considerations.

But have you seen manufacturers even asking for this? The only ones who have been asking were the oil companies.

That is because Tesla is starting with the Long Range Model, and cheaper models coming later.

What are you talking about? The Model X is not the equivalent to the Mach-E, the Model Y is. The Model Y is slightly bigger than the Mach-E and Model X is even larger.

It’s the job of the dealerships to generate demand. But when you go into a dealership and:

On time is still on time.

1st gear: Well, goes to show UAW is no friend of electric cars. Which isn’t surprising considering how much they’ve been attacking them.

IF you are up for comparing Model X and Model S, then I see no reason you can’t compare Model 3.

Tesla Model 3 was released on schedule, despite delay in mass production.

But none of that equates to “half”.

Then why not compare to the Model 3?

“It’s going to be basically half the price of a Tesla, and I’ve got to think the technology is going to be better,”

When Bond started that CybrTruck, I heard engine start noise!

There are 2 ways I can think of to go about it with accessories:

But you brought it up considering SEC found no issues. Isn’t that being deceptive? You were trying to imply that there was some issue when SEC said there wasn’t any.

Yeah, that is most definitely creative accounting. Even more so since they offer incentives to consumers for said cars that are already “bought”.

You are doing some “Creative accounting” there you are aware right? You can’t just divide net income to calculate lose per vehicle. It doesn’t work that way at all. Because it doesn’t reflect only costs of vehicles.

Pretty sure he died in 1998 :/

And yet, whenever there is a leak of something, someone seems to always dig up their blurry cam from who knows where.

1) They are following GAAP just fine, them not following GAAP is a myth. You are required by law to post GAAP numbers and they are fully compliant.