If you’re a white guy, and you refer to black people as “the blacks,” you are definitely racist. You might not know it, but you are definitely racist.
If you’re a white guy, and you refer to black people as “the blacks,” you are definitely racist. You might not know it, but you are definitely racist.
Only if you’re planning to profit off of it. Otherwise all you’re doing is voiding your warranty.
What is the problem with this? Why shouldn’t it be promoted?
No it doesn’t, it just stands against this whole “she’s not like the others” schtick that keeps getting thrown around.
The common sense side of this argument states simply that three-plus decades of Nintendo games have taught us that we’d be getting a full game upon purchase, or at least the potential to complete a game.
But you concluded that his statement would apply to all dlc, when it doesn’t.
Indeed it does. It’s bad business. But that doesn’t make any of us entitled to purchase products Nintendo doesn’t want to sell us.
Yes, but (for now) capitalism is regulated so that IP theft is illegal.
Then why do an interview?
Up those communication skills! It can only benefit you.
a gamer has every right to expect that they can complete the game they paid for.
Whether the data is stored on the game disc or on the developers’ servers doesn’t really make much of a difference in the current software landscape. Content is either available or it’s not. Where it’s stored is just a matter of logistics.
Dont know what to tell you, man. You made a generalization, and you’re trying to argue that it was a specific statement. That’s just blatantly false.
What are people expecting, here? A hype video?
Without bipartisan cooperation there’s literally no chance of impeachment.
Comey’s memos and testimony, first and foremost. What we have right now are reports. Facts are pretty thin.
I don’t know what you want. “Let’s gather the evidence and get the ball rolling” is pretty much the appropriate response. What are you looking for, a pre-fight WWE promo video?
I agree it’s bad business, but that’s their decision and their problem. Doesn’t make me entitled to their products if they don’t want to sell them to me. And also, refusing to sell something to someone is the opposite of “ripping them off.” You have to actually make a deal with someone for it to be a rip-off.
I agree, but his comment wasn’t about Amiibos, but about “a product,” as in, “I would consider paying for a product and being unable to access all of its content being ripped off.” He’s applying the argument broadly, not specifically to Amiibo.