
Nah; manual transmission paired with an engine that delivers actual torque from idle (as opposed to the turbo-derived one that only shows up once you give it beans) is just fine in start-stop traffic.
Nah; manual transmission paired with an engine that delivers actual torque from idle (as opposed to the turbo-derived one that only shows up once you give it beans) is just fine in start-stop traffic.
If nothing else, BF1 brought WW1's centenary to a much bigger audience.
Here is my photo album from the 2015 Cruise-In, when I attended with my CTS-V: https://goo.gl/photos/igt1DgQEzk4Jh6Cz5
No, Vancouver; Calgary dealers were the closest to me to have 6MT CTS-V2s in stock. So I drove my M3 there on Sunday, did the trade-in and pick-up Monday morning, and then drove the new car back to get home Monday night.
Melbourne Red Metallic. It’s got a tinge of orange, and it was a standard colour. Imola would be BMW Individual :-(
The Vagon shares the front end with the Sedan and Coupe V2s, while the rear is exactly the same as the CTS Wagon. GM Performance didn’t even bother with larger exhaust tips (and thus larger bumper cut-outs) vs. the CTS 3.6. Thus Bob Lutz I believe once stated that they only needed to sell 3... or some other miniscule…
The first one on BaT in ended in March for $56k....
Minus-10 in the twisty bits, Plus-10 on the straightaways (and invariably legal passing lanes, due to sightlines)? Aye.
Aye, it’s a direct drop-in, and is generally tested to reduce Intake Air Temp, which means more HP if asked. That “lid” is the only documented difference between the CTS-V2 and Camaro5 ZL1, that can explain the 24bhp factory rating difference (556bhp vs. 580bhp).
My loaded 6MT Sedan, since new: 14.63mpg; slightly lower in winter, slightly higher in summer. A/C on or off, seems to make no difference.
Yeah, the “pleasures of handling” is nice... but only when you have the back roads all to yourself. In the real world, where you can’t get the CHP to close the road on your behalf, because you’re not Motor Trend...