Good luck. It's actually pretty fun. Enjoy it. And the employment situation is nowhere near as dire as others are stating.

I like it. He gets interesting guests and the interviews are always good. Only problem I see is he does too many segments in 30 minutes, so often a good discussion gets cut short.

Same here. I even got tired of Garp toward the end. And the quirkiness like dancing bears does nothing for me. I want to like him, I just can't.

It's probably the most important election in my lifetime, and I don't want to read or listen to one more fucking word about it. I just can't wait for it to be over.

I have a theory that all the people that reflexively bash Chipotle are just jumping on the snark bandwagon and a lot of them have never actually eaten at Chipotle.

1 for 2 ain't bad

They really aren't. They are good. Nowhere near what they are hyped to be. Not even the best fast food burger. edit this was supposed to be a reply to OneEye re In and Out. Wtf

What's up with all the spoilers in the Siskel and Ebert review?

I loved Ghostbusters, hated Ghostbusters 2, probably would not have watched a Ghostbusters 3 even with the original cast, so to me, the idea of a remake just made no sense. And I feel the same about many other remakes. Going with an all female cast seemed like a gimmick and if anything, more patronizing than…

It's all an act. I think she's always been conservative, but figured out she would sell the most books and make the most money by being as extreme as possible. She's all about the money and she's making a lot of it.

Me too! Last week wasn't the finale, was it? God I hope not.

It actually could be a great story. I read The Fifties, by David Halberstam, which had a long chapter about McDonald's. It was absolutely fascinating.

Exactly. Who drinks like a whole carton of orange juice in a day or something. You drink a bit at breakfast. It's great when you first wake up. Fuck this article and all this bullshit. The comments are great though.

Yeah, some of the AV writers are really sounding like Gawker writers and it is disturbing to me. I really hope this trend ends.

That was my take as well.

Well I answered your question incorrectly. What was her basis for thinking the boyfriend did it and not Naz. I think it was the fact that Box came to her, and she said fuck it, we have more on the kid, but that stuck with her. Then when she does her closing, she hesitates at the end. She really is no longer sure.…

Based on her hesitation in the final moments of closing and declining to prosecute and the fact that Box actually knew his shit and couldn't let it go. So everything I said before really.

Wow I think you nailed it there.

That "in loving memory of James Gandolfini" in the credits made me tear up a bit.

I think she was convinced the boyfriend was the guy. Box was doing this on his own time post retirement, and wouldn't have come to her, in the middle of Naz's trial, if he wasn't sure. That's why she hesitated at the last moment of her closing argument, and why she declined to prosecute after the mistrial, after…