therealdealjohnnyscarecrow
therealdealjohnnyscarecrow
therealdealjohnnyscarecrow

I don’t know if they actually did it, but Toyota had a unique lease-to-own plan with the LFA:

Correct. A right of first refusal is not a restraint on alienation...in the case of real property.

....I mean, the distance on the jump was pretty impressive...

I've got a headache now.

But I bet you can't get a decent plate down there.

This is very possible.

All the plaintiff has to establish is an injury and a duty of care. I don’t know how you can say that didn’t occur here.

And again, it doesn’t so much as mater as you as a spectator percieves it as dangerous, it matters whether the track knew or should have known that tyoe of accident could happen at that particular track could have happened and they voluntarily undertook the duty to protect those spectators.

replied to you elsewhere.

It might.

What? Please cite the case law that supports that absolutely absurd position. Because if it did, attorneys like me wouldn't be able to make a living.

It doesn’t matter what the plaintiff knows. It matters what the defendant knows and the steps they take to care for the customer.

A reasonable person wouldn’t put spectators further away or build a stronger fence when they force 3000+lb pound cars to drive in packs at over 200mph that are known to leave the ground in the instance of a large wreck?

See my other reply to you elsewhere because the standard for negligence is pretty low.

And was there something that nascar did to create the raving as close as it is?

That's usually the case with the corvettes. If you're local, check out the Memorial Day races next year and camp, you won't be disappointed. I'll even have a cold beer for you at my site.

Many thanks. Wish I could have been there. Hate to miss an event at lime rock.

They came back and won after the not so great start? I guess that long caution for the BMW when I stopped watching helped them...

Being injuried is all the law requires for a complaint. The rest comes through the case and discovery as the type and severity of injury is a point of contention for the finder of fact to decide.

As the other person responded said, head injuries and their severity often don’t manifest until well after the time of injury.