White is a perfectly fine word to capitalize if it's a sentence's first word or a humanses last name. Also other assorted exceptions.

Don't you understand? A chance at a date ISSSS your tip. Because they' re awesome.

1 - 4K gaming is almost here!
2 - no it's not, it costs two grand to do 4K, many people can't afford that.
3 - but I built my PC for only 1250!
4 - does it do 4K?
3b - no.
4b - then the argument stands. 4K costs 2 grand.

I'm not sure which is worse. Someone pulling their Yahoo literally, or euphemistically.

I'm weird. I sometimes like low bitrate versions of songs because I like the slight glitchy noise it gives. Yeah... I'm definitely a digital guy, and a rough/gritty one.

Possibly. But those aren't in all games, and they're definitely not all quality jobs. Plus even higher specs needed (then again if your PC can handle 4k...)

no u

Except that 4K textures are spread across a whole object, such as a car or a giant mech, while we can walk up to and look at only a single tire. And in general, the environment gets way too little texturespace compared to characters:

What you're experiencing is traditional MSAA anti aliasing. In ye olden days, an engine would simply render at 2x by 2x the resolution and then scale down 4 pixels to 1, and have great smooth graphics. But the performance hit was exactly as big as you imagine it to be.

Buys 3000 dollar PC, won't spend 3 bucks on proper fitting gloves.

On a 3 thousand dollar PC? No thanks. I'd rather pay an extra 5% to avoid any and all kind of driver/software conflicts that make my work software throw a hissy fit, and have some extra warranties. 100 bucks builder fee is worth the difference on a 300 dollar PC, not on a 3000 dollar one. Plus it keeps one person in a…

What I'm really interested in is getting one of those 'cheap' 600 buck, 40 inch 4k screens. They'll do 30hz at 4k, great for internet/photoshop, or 120hz at 1080p, great for games/movies while not having to bust the bank on a GPU. Benefits of both world, without having to pay top dollar. Also helps that I indend to…

seven-twenty

Gaming on 3x 4K? Yeah I guess that turns the room pretty hot. Poor poor GPU. :'(

Keep in mind though that back then, 1600x1200 was NOT the standard; that would be 1024x768. 1600x1200 was a high-end-ish monitor more like 2560x1440p is nowadays.

How does your rig handle 4K gaming?

Yes but sadly those only run 120hz at 1080p. They only do 30hz at 4K (a bandwidth thing, because x4 the pixels and /4 the hertz).

That's not optimization of the games. That's underpowered hardware.

PC games are not programmed less good, but less optimized. PCs trade in a fair bit of performance shortcuts for stability/predictability since it needs to work on much more chipset configurations. If you find 'one amazing trick' for a PS4, it'll work on all of them, if you find a similar trick for a Nvidia Titan, it…