thepak
thepak
thepak

I’m complaining a bit at your comment because your stance is one oft-repeated. It’s not that I don’t believe your view has some merit, but that it’s a bit of a facile take that many people with a superficial interest in Geopolitics take.

The base complaint that I am making is that you’re not really reckoning with many

Does this have any local coop at all or does everyone need a switch and their own copy?

Err, what do you actually know about the initiation of this particular boycott, and what do you interpret to be the aim of it? Because, compared to other Korea-Japan disagreements, it’s pretty cut-and-dry, and I don’t really think your comment applies to this situation very strongly. Frankly, it reeks of someone who

I’d get more resources than just Asian Boss. I enjoy their videos, but they almost always come packed in with a narrative and majority views that align with their target demographic.

>You know, normally I’d say that historical events have weight and that South Korean people are right in being very sensitive on this

A fair amount of of Congress and Elections and most of politics are PR stunts by some metric. That doesn’t mean it completely lacks meaning.

It doesn’t matter when it was initiated, it matters when and how it enters the public consciousness and how that narrative effects the events in that time.

During her SoS term, she was one of the most-liked politicians out there, I’d say second to Obama among liberals.  Republican attacks can’t really override that so

I don’t believe this.

Many of the narratives formed that hurt Clinton the most [corruption and being in bed with wall street] would never credibly come from a Republican source and instead they were generally inherited from the primary.

It’s really easy for people to scoff and say “oh, this doesn’t REALLY happen”,

Hardware and software quality aside, Nintendo is becoming such a consumer-unfriendly company.

Between Fan content takedowns, shitty multiplayer [and additional features implementation], ending physical rewards programs and the joy-con drift nonsense, it’s really annoying to be a fan of the company.

I’m extremely hesitant to buy a version of the switch with joy-cons fused to the controller until they can more-reliably fix joy-cons. Out of four that I bought, 3 have drift issues, and it doesn’t seem like Nintendo wants to take any notice of it at all.

Without a late-game AoE breaking mechanic, strong tanky knight-clusters will probably just roll for a win.

If you’re paranoid of assassins, I’ve found that making a triangle towards one of the upper corners [closer to the middle of the board] works well:
R R T
R M
M

Please forgive shoddy ascii. So what this means is that a meelee hero is the furthest away from the enemy, so he’ll get jumped. The Tank is closest to the enemy,

Weirdly, isn’t that turning out to be a bad business decision in a way that was predictable?

For what its worth, Korea is about 30-40 years out from unpacking a dictatorship, so there’s a lot of backwards legislation still lingering about.

I get the joke, but I think the same thing could be said for the US regarding women:

I feel like the crux of my point is that when the video game seems to actively encourage or condone that sort of deviant behavior, then it’s problematic, and that’s where the talk of censorship might come in.

I think this is a fairly valid take, however, I think a lot of it depends on the context of the presentation and the implications it places on the target audience.

For instance, are there and should there be valid works of art and video games that feature heinous acts including murder, rape and pedophilia? Sure, I’d

If you’re just going to ignore the actual point I made in favor of your petty bullshit, you coulda told me before.

In this instance, categorizing it as a trademark or a copyright isn’t really the point at hand here, and I would have thought that you knew that. Are you going to say that invoking a trademark isn’t a

This is pretty irrelevant to the point I was making.

But sure.  Try saying Super Bowl in a commercial production.

The law exists to protect creators. The extremely-likely reason that the law is like that is that, is that it was unthinkable at the time to basically take dance moves as a discrete unit unto itself and profit off of it.

Now here’s the thing. Guy A has some creative work. Guy B is making money in part *because* Guy A

FWIW, Korea doesn’t have a strong console gaming culture, in favor of PCs.
There’s a LOT of people who don’t have PS4s.

At the same time, VR is really picking up in Korea, lately. [There are more than a few VR-Cafes, where you just go with friends and play VR games.] That combination probably makes this sale hit a sweet