How would " regular thieves" know enough to pull off that kind of heist?

Speak for yourself, Jimmy can't become Saul Goodman too quickly to suit me. Judging by the Abby Road commercial ge's in the procesd of shooting, I think it's going to be very soon.

Why is ecerybody so hard core against tge previews? You know they aren't going to show you that much.

I think you might be over thinking things. Jimmy left the bed to take care of the loose end at the Copy Shop.

I caught that too, only one of them should have been barefoot.

You know, people, I'm wondering if Mike really sees consciously what Stacy is up to, and if it's just slightly possible that Jimmy might be the one to open Mike's eyes to the reality of her conniving ways.

Exactly. You've got me thinking, maybe Jimmy will be the one to open Mike's eyes to that.

I noticed that too. How in the fuck can open carry gun laws be anywhere close to relevant in a series that takes place in New York City, one of the most gun restrictive cities in the country? On the other hand, unfortunately, Oliver is probably not at all off base in reading the intent of the writers, which is itself…

It's Tio, and yes, that actually seems so obvious to me I have to wonder whether they are going to pull a surprise and end up making Nacho somehow responsible, or somebody else.

Yeah, that's pretty much the way I see their relationship.

She's Slippin' Jimmy with a vagina, is all.

People don't want to see Jimmy as a bad guy, even though he clearly is. Likeable as hell, but still a bad guy. I think we'll eventually see this is why Kim is basically attracted to him, and that neither she, nor Chuck, are actually as good as they want people to think they are.

After episode 6, I think it's inaccurate to say that Nacho is the only one of the Salamanca gang who knows Mike's true mettle.

Huell is another character it will be good to see again, assuming the actor doesn't drop dead from a stroke or heart attack.

Granted, it would take an extreme situation, something traumatic and life changing. I'm not really expecting it so much as wondering what the story behind the "Saul Goodman & Associates" name might actually mean.

I considered that too, a distinct possibility. And it probably will end up as something like that. In real life, though, I don't think it would fly. For one thing, it's going to limit your client base to nothing BUT total dumbasses and scumbags. Which may even be the point.

Oh I know we'll get there eventually, and I'm sure the payoff will be worth the weight. Still, I want as many seasons of pure Saul as possible, and we know the number of seasons will be limited by the nature of the show.

I considered that, but I'm pretty sure that could get him in ethical trouble with the NM Bar Association. Granted, that's not exactly stopped him up until now, but something so blatantly obvious might be a tad too much.

He's just not around long enough to deserve co-star billing.

I rewatched a later season 3 episode (I've already forgotten which one) of Breaking Bad a few nights ago, and was reminded of something I didn't pay much attention to the first time I saw it.