Why in the world is Kotaku covering poker? I draw the line at anal beads and chess.

Cool, another story that just a series of tweets.

Why is this a story? Wait, what the heck is thetakeout.com and why is this now popping up in my Kotaku and AV Club daily emails?

I thought Coolidge was the worst of the visitors from season one, so it’s a bummer to see her in this one as well. I’m on the fence. It looks like Aubrey Plaza is playing more than the usual “Aubrey Plaza” shtick, at least, which is a plus—albeit only marginally.

Then you should be happy, as Kotaku continuously finds ways to work “anal beads” into this, either the headlines or the story itself.

I love these Kotaku “articles” that are just a series of tweets.

I knew as soon as I read the headline in my daily email: This was gonna be a slideshow.

I’m so glad I get my news of piscatorial shenanigans from AV Club...

A conversation with my 13-year old after reading this ‘news’ article:

Me: Hey, do you know the youtube guy, Dream, who does Minecraft videos?
Son: Uhh, yeah. Why?
Me: Do you know he revealed his face recently?
Son: <looks around> So?

That pretty much sums it up.

I could care less if it is a gay rom-com. Is it an actually good movie? I watch things all the time that aren’t red-blooded testosterone-fueled flicks to branch out, but if Eichner does his usual schtick, that’s reason enough for me to stay away. Has nothing to do with sexuality.

You lost me at “Start slideshow” but did get a well-deserved LOL from “the final Halloween” from your headline. Final? Ok...

Ugg, I got sucked in. For those that don’t want to waste 90-seconds, it’s basically reporting that Bourdain’s brother claims parts of the book were fabricated or misrepresented. Done.

Wait, a convicted felon may have lied or withheld information in previous interviews? Say it ain't so.

I'm surprised Google kept it as long as they did. Of course, I gotta admit, I thought they had canned it several months back.

It’s only an easter egg if people don’t know the references, right? Else it’s just a callback to another entry.

I have seen many a film in my decades, but I have to admit I have never watched a Monroe film. And AV Club’s insistence on using slideshows means my streak lives on.

It’s 2022, isn’t it just cowpeople now?

If we are even one step closer to the end of seeing “anal beads” for the sole purpose of attention-grabbing headlines, I’m all for it.

Wait, there was a Charlie’s Angels reboot in 2019?

Good, I was about to ask if this film was actually good. So all the negative press is likely an attempt to generate interest for something people would not be likely to watch anyway. Right?