I mean, yeah, I guess, though I still don't think that justifies this terrible song and it's even worse message (her booty is all that matters? Those without booties need not apply? The terrible affected voice she's singing in?). I find her shtick really insincere and another example of disingenuous marketing. YMMV.

Someone posted this above—the author addresses your question towards the end of the piece: http://jennytrout.com/?p=7857

"scary skinny woman with no hips or breasts or fat"

She looks like a size 8 to me, which is one of the reasons I find this song and her so odious. She's not a big girl! She's just poorly dressed, and being marketed like this.

This is awesome, thank you.

God, this woman and this song are both totally insufferable. A 'friend' posted the video last week on Facebook, but I had no idea she was so popular. News that her single is so big makes me very frowny face.

The butter child is far more disturbing.

I would expect no less from someone named Mr. Ogre. ;)

Lol, nice troll. A bit simplistic, though—you should up your game next time.

You never can trust those vegetarian financial associates up north.

So let me get this straight—calling out your disingenuous and offensive arguments and analogies somehow makes me a "nasty human being"? What is wrong with you? Do you interact with real people, or do you just like to flame people on Jezebel? Do me a favor and don't answer that.

News flash: your very specific and difficult childhood doesn't apply to all people everywhere ever, nor does your own discomfort at your infertility mean you are in a position to dictate how other human beings live their lives.

Yeah, like I said: increasingly incoherent. Good luck projecting your personal trials onto every person you interact with. I'm sure it's going well for you.

No, AdalsOk: you made the heinous, unnecessary analogy that parenthood is akin to slavery. I can't believe you are a person that thinks this is a remotely acceptable thing to say, and it says far more about you than it does about those who are patiently engaging with you.

Okay, so you can't back up your accusation (and you alluded to the fact that you think being libertarian is a bad thing*, which makes said accusation an ad hominem attack). Noted.

Okay, what? The only person comparing children to slaves is you. What am I even reading?!

Please cite the relevant parts of Stl25TA's various arguments which "prove" s/he is a libertarian. Really, go for it.

Your argument has become increasingly incoherent, particularly the notion that one would, in rejecting fostering, ipso facto be a "shitty parent" if their children have any addiction or other issues later in life. That's patently absurd, and offensive.

Or Proust!

Ellebee is a troll, yo. Best to disengage.