This just pointlessly adds expense to game production.

Where the part about all games being aimed at kids regardless of content, because as large an audience as possible.

“1.) they really enjoy the actual game, watching the videos and commenting with like minded people makes them feel like part of a real community.”

Skank skanks, discuss.

Now, did I say it was a GOOD plot? :P

Surely he isn’t even Bruce Wayne any more? It’s Just Bruce Wayne’s body..and if I’m reading it right, it’s not even amnesia, the brain’s been replaced. What makes this more acceptable than some stranger setting up shop in his body?

“So setting aside the absurdity of the fact that 9 million people are regularly watching some random guy play Minecraft”

I’m quite the opposite with the toe nail thing. I took a job as a security guard and went from sitting on my ass all day to standing for 15 hrs.. and doing so in a pair of ‘work shoes’ as opposed to the trainers my soft and delicate feet had gotten used to. My right pinkie toe nail had up to then been claw like and…

This was considered a mystery? No-one told me... however I knew who Red Buttons was.

This kind of shit just strikes me as ‘reverse psychology’..

So how is this supposed to work with the fact that all they ever do is pump out movies of him as a child?

This seems like the same direction of the cartoon movie, and as I said then, what’s the point of his powerful sorcery if he’s just going to use a sword.

What the FUDGE??!!??

Fuck this bullshit.

You do realise this is utter biased bullshit don’t you?

In case you haven’t looked outside your window in a while, abortion has been legal for quite a while now, and it’s entirely up to the individual relgion on what rules they want followed AND up to the follower whether they want to follow an institution that has those rules, so no subjugation there either, it’s purely…

Isn’t it just the minority that are against abortion?.. This woman acts as if she’s ‘putting it to the masses’ when in fact she holds no more than a majority opinion.

If I want to see a hillside I’ll go to a hillside.

Visual representation by one party is irrelevent, or at the very least inherently wrong when the source is the written word of a second, unless the second has specific oversight.

Nope. The topic is her description, specifically the author’s description to the readerS, plural.