Catch 22? Nah. They want clicks and advertising dollars true. But there are so many stories out there, they can not report on this one so that less people find out about and look at those private photos.

Reporting on this shit at all is counter productive.

That includes all of the sites reporting on this.

Why do entertainment sites report on this stuff? If leaking private photos is so bad because their privacy is invaded (it is), why tell millions of people that this happened?

Because evil tricksters here got it in my head that the ratings were low even for FX and that it would be canceled.

Don't tell me this tell Sam Jackson!!!! PS - I'm not yelling this is how I talk!!!

WOOOOOO
I was legitimately worried this would get canceled

I agree with that.

That is true every single time except for that one time he went off on an entertainment reporter for confusing him with Lawerence Fishburne

But not fuckable apparently?

Trump is a paranoid delusional narcissist fuckwit.

*facepalm* Her character wasn't a man or Asian. Ur joke fails.

It's also utterly pointless. There is a script, there is an actor who discusses the script with the director going over the themes and the performance the director wants. And get this the director directed the dude's performance too while they were filming.

"…has responded to a criticism from actor Samuel L. Jackson, who recently questioned why a British man was cast in a film about American racism."

SNL IS A SHOW!? I thought they just had some content online. Like a dozen or so sketches a year.

Soon this place may go up its own ass.

You replied twice to the same comment? Cute.

Cute, you claim you aren't a troll. So… Are you high right now? Drunk? Just plain dense with an IQ below 70? It has to be one of those if you aren't a troll. You know why? Because I was specifically talking about this specific case with this specific character. This is one of the *few* characters where the…

Good point!

Oh you're just a troll, ok then. Sad that people took you seriously.