the quality on those parts is all great. there were quality issues with the model X fit and fitment due to an overly complex launch. the model 3's launch has been stripped to bare bones to prevent a similar launch from happening. yet the quality is being averaged down in expectations because of the botched model X…

nice

I think it is irresponsible to try and predict the quality of a vehicle with only 2 datapoints in history. The launch of the Model S, and the X. There is nothing you can infer from so little data. It is junk science and I think that Consumer Reports should take heed that they run the risk of eroding the quality and…

is this that cash me outside girl?

One place to start is with people that actually own cars. This is all smoke. Not one consumer, nor the publication, have had one moment of experience with the car, yet its already been castrated with a less than desirable reliability rating?

Your parents committed a crime, so im pretty sure you’re going to be a criminal when you grow up too. Also, the character Biff was a real dick in Back to the future, so im sure you’re a dick too and nobody should take you seriously. This is based on my analysis and modeling that projects out your personality traits…

Its very stupid and if you are regarded in the industry as the “definitive” word in product reviews, you should be only using definitive metrics in your analysis.

I was thinking the same thing... Why would I give up so many comfort options for 10-30 pounds of weight savings? I’m willing to bet that you’re average Porsche buyer could stand to lose this amount of weight off their waistline.

This article is ridiculous. It will be nearly impossible for either of these companies to fail.

2000 words on a semantic argument that is meant to make me, as a tax payer, feel like a racist if I get mad about wasted tax dollars?

I remember when this site led the charge against Skeumorphism... They the bloggers cry when they cannot instantly recognize what an icon is for. Fucking bitch ass bloggers will always bitch, and never be fucking happy.

today in common fucking sense...

Maybe you have something server side then that works similarly to a two factor authenticator. Also if you make it so that the cheat is difficult to implement because they need multiple executables running etc. you at least make the impact a bit lower.

Its not an opinion, its fact. The building mechanics add much more variable into any persons play style than a game that does not contain said mechanics. And you probably don’t like it because you aren’t good.

Checksum is always server side. For example you can calculate a hash of the executable file and concatenate an additional variable of the executable file’s CRC value at a given time under a multiplier. It would then be sent over before every match.

lol I noticed that too!

Fortnite takes more skill to play than PUBG, just sayin... If you get into a dual with a skilled player that can build well you’re going to lose every time, no matter how good you are in general at FPS.

the building aspect is exactly what makes Fortnite better, and a more skilled game than PUBG which takes less skill to play competitively.

Fortnite’s mode is SO much better than PUBG, that is why BlueHole is upset.

theres a way to do a MD5 checksum, that is encrypted and secure and impossible to decode in the time it takes to get a multiplayer match going. I don’t know why more game companies don’t use a method like this, when it is so widespread elsewhere.